Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Deepanshu Sharma & Anr. v. Vikrant Tyagi
The Delhi High Court allowed defendants conditional leave to defend a summary suit upon timely deposit of security and filing of written statement, emphasizing strict compliance with court directions.
Sharda v. Rahul Gupta
The court held that photographs from digital devices can be used to confront a witness only if accompanied by a certificate under Section 63 of the Indian Evidence Act, allowing the petitioner to re-confront the witness upon compliance.
Anamika Sarkar v. Surender Kumar
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner’s request to enhance physical visitation rights from once to twice a week by consent, maintaining existing video call arrangements.
Uma and Ors v. Renu Kumari and Ors
The Delhi High Court recalled the Trial Court's order closing the defendants' right to file a written statement for non-payment of cost, allowing them to pay the cost and file the statement within a stipulated time in the interest of justice.
Mr. Nitin Kumar and Ms. Sagarika Kaul v. Smt Sandhya Gupta and Ors
The Delhi High Court allowed the tenant's petition to file additional affidavits amending leave to defend applications and directed expeditious disposal of the eviction proceedings under bona fide requirement ground.
Mr. Manish Vashist v. Chainsukh Ujjwal
The Delhi High Court directed a fresh medical examination by an independent Medical Board for a provisionally selected candidate declared medically unfit, holding the Board's report final and binding to ensure fairness.
Sunil Kalra and Ors v. Vikas Gupta and Ors
The Delhi High Court allowed tenants to amend their leave to defend applications in eviction proceedings and directed expeditious disposal by the Rent Controller, emphasizing procedural fairness and timely adjudication.
Adnan Nisar v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court held that offences under foreign laws corresponding to scheduled offences with cross border implications fall within PMLA's ambit, validating ED's investigation and arrest based on an MLA request, and denied bail to accused involved in cryptocurrency fraud.
Tanveer Ahmed Mir et al. v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court granted bail to Amandeep Singh Dhall in a PMLA case, emphasizing the primacy of fundamental rights and the twin conditions under Section 45 PMLA, while imposing stringent conditions to safeguard the investigation.
Amit Arora v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to a seriously ill accused under PMLA, emphasizing the primacy of the right to health and liberty under Article 21 over statutory bail restrictions.
Ziaul Haque & Ors. v. Delhi Development Authority & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that displaced Jhuggie dwellers who prove residential status and meet DDA policy criteria are entitled to rehabilitation despite allegations of incidental commercial use, setting aside the denial based on insufficient evidence.
Rajeshwar Nath Gupta & Others v. Ashok Jain & Others
The Delhi High Court held that a leasehold property conveyed as undivided shares under a perpetual lease deed cannot be physically partitioned without permission, and restrained unilateral partition attempts by injunction.
Amit Katyal v. Directorate of Enforcement Government of India
Delhi High Court granted regular bail to petitioner accused under PMLA, holding that the value of proceeds involved was below Rs. 1 crore exempting him from twin test and considering his medical condition and cooperation with investigation.
Rabina Ghale & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Supreme Court quashed FIRs against Army personnel for lack of prior Central Government sanction under Section 6 of the AFSPA, holding such sanction mandatory for prosecution.
FUJIFILM INDIA PVT. LTD v. MACART EQUIPMENT PVT. LTD
The Delhi High Court extended the arbitrator's mandate by one year under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, allowing continuation of arbitration proceedings and permitting the respondent to seek recall of claimant’s witnesses.
MIS. TATA ALDESA (JV) v. MIS. DEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to extend the arbitrator's mandate by six months under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with no objection from the respondent.
The State of NCT of Delhi v. Shyam Kishore Alias Putan
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a POCSO sexual assault case due to lack of medical evidence, failure of victim to identify the accused, and inconsistencies in testimony.
Mrs. Arti Gupta & Anr. v. Puran Rana & Anr.
The Delhi High Court cancelled the respondent's trademark registration for "KONVIO NEER" due to dishonest adoption and deceptive similarity with the petitioner's prior registered marks, upholding the petitioners' exclusive rights under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Kunal Food Products Pvt. Ltd. v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the denial of pre-reference and pendente lite interest in an arbitration award, holding that the arbitrator's decision was neither perverse nor patently illegal.
Surender Gupta and Anr v. Rajat Wadhwa
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the execution order related to transfer charges, emphasizing the pendency of a Section 34 arbitration petition and directing parties to pursue remedies as per law.