Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Rita Nimesh v. Anil Nimesh
The Delhi High Court directed interim maintenance of Rs.9,000 per month for children pending separate maintenance proceedings under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, clarifying that the family court's denial of maintenance to the appellant based on her income would not influence those proceedings.
Vikrant Khanna & Ors. v. Amita Lamba & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the mandatory time limits under its Original Side Rules for filing written statements, allowing extensions only for sufficient cause with costs, and dismissed the appeal against taking a delayed written statement on record subject to enhanced costs.
Praveen Kumar v. Sushil Chandra Gautam
The Delhi High Court condoned delay in filing appeal and granted appellants time to vacate suit property upon undertaking, disposing of the appeal accordingly.
M/S TREND SETTERS BOOKS LTD v. LOKESH SHARMA
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner a single opportunity to cross-examine the respondent/workman in ongoing labour court proceedings, setting aside the earlier order denying such opportunity, subject to no adjournments.
M/S Trend Setters Books Ltd. v. Pramod Kumar Sharma
The Delhi High Court set aside the Labour Court's order denying cross-examination and granted the petitioner one opportunity to cross-examine the respondent/workman on specified conditions.
TREASURE STUDIO INC & ANR. v. MOHIT KHUNGAR & ANR.
The Delhi High Court cancelled the respondent's deceptively similar trademark registration 'COCOMELON' obtained in bad faith, upholding the petitioners' prior well-known trademark rights.
KOTESHWAR CHEMFOOD INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. v. SACHDEVA AND SONS INDUSTRES PVT. LTD.
Delhi High Court ordered rectification of respondent's trademark registration for 'PRIME' in Class-30 by deleting salt and spices due to non-use and deceptive similarity with petitioner's prior registered mark.
M/S Mandy Enterprises Proprietorship Concern v. Deputy Commissioner, CGST Division and Another
The Delhi High Court directed immediate compliance with an appellate order granting GST refund to the legal heir, emphasizing that tax authorities cannot withhold refunds without challenging the order.
Ms. Neha Yadav, Advocate and SI Vikash Kumar v. Bhupendra Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging medical disqualification due to tattoo after the candidate removed the tattoo, directing his admission to police training.
SGS India Private Limited v. Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court directed the appointed arbitrator to decide the petition as an application under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, while maintaining the interim order until further orders.
Rollz India Waste Management Pvt Ltd v. Pan India Infra Projects Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that insolvency proceedings against a respondent do not bar the Commercial Court from ordering release of a fixed deposit deposited as security in arbitration proceedings when the respondent has withdrawn its claim.
CELEBI DELHI CARGO TERMINAL MANAGEMENT INDIA PVT. LTD. v. SALES TAX OFFICER, NEW DELHI
The Delhi High Court remanded a GST tax demand order for fresh consideration due to a technical glitch in the GST portal affecting output tax liability reconciliation.
Abhishek Grover v. Divisional Commissioner Delhi
The Delhi High Court restored the eviction order against a son for ill-treating senior citizen parents under the Senior Citizens Act, holding that summary eviction does not require conclusive ownership proof and that appellate interference must be reasoned.
Jagmohan Chaudhary v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that injuries sustained during official training constitute 'active government duty' entitling the petitioner to medical category relaxation and promotion benefits under Standing Order 04/2008.
ATC Telecom Infrastructure Pvt Ltd v. Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal directing the Single Judge to consider all grounds of challenge in the Section 34 petition and condoned the delay in filing the appeal.
Jain Irrigation Systems Limited v. M/S. Pragyawan Technologies Private Limited
Delhi High Court lacks territorial jurisdiction to entertain suit against defendant with subordinate office and cause of action in Noida despite registered office in Delhi and exclusive jurisdiction clause; plaint returned under Order VII Rule 10 CPC.
Aditya Goel v. Joginder Singh & Ors.
The High Court set aside a First Appellate Court order that summarily allowed an appeal without notice, emphasizing the necessity of hearing all parties before disposing of appeals affecting interim injunctions.
Rajneesh Kumar Rathore v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that Indian courts cannot order release or extradition of an Indian citizen detained abroad but directed continued consular support and allowed family representations to the MEA.
Omwati v. Dayanand Thr Lrs
The High Court directed the Trial Court to re-summon a witness and allowed coercive process if the witness fails to appear, ensuring speedy disposal of a long-pending civil suit.
Sahay v. D. Sargurunathan
Delhi High Court dismissed petition for lack of territorial jurisdiction, allowing withdrawal with liberty to approach the appropriate High Court as per Supreme Court precedent.