Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Bharat Bhushan & Others v. Atul Gupta
The Delhi High Court allowed the tenant's revision petition, setting aside the eviction order and granting leave to defend, holding that sale of other shops shortly before eviction raises triable issues on bona fide requirement under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Swarn Nijhawan and Others v. M/s G.D. Seigell & Co. Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of the tenant on the landlord's bona fide requirement under the Delhi Rent Control Act, dismissing tenant's plea for leave to defend due to lack of triable issues.
Mohd Nasir and Ors. v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of appellants for grievous injuries under Sections 308, 326, and 34 IPC, affirming that reliable ocular and medical evidence sufficed despite non-recovery of the weapon.
Vivek Jatin Chaudhary v. Deepti Ture
The Delhi High Court upheld the interim maintenance order but remanded the matter to reconsider arrears by accounting for the petitioner's income variance over the relevant years.
Satbir v. State GNCTD
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's finding that the petitioner was above 18 years on the date of the incident based on ossification tests of multiple joints, rejecting the application of a two-year margin of error and discretionary benefit under juvenile justice rules.
Atul Pundhir v. M/S The Delhi Group & Anr.
The High Court upheld the acquittal in a Section 138 NI Act case, holding that the accused successfully rebutted statutory presumptions and the complainant failed to prove the existence of a legally enforceable debt.
Union of India & Ors. v. Yogesh Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's order allowing a railway employee's promotion despite initial absence of medical examination in the required category, emphasizing re-examination provisions and non-arbitrariness in departmental recruitment.
Kamran and Others v. State of N.C.T. of Delhi and Another
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34, 506 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act following an amicable settlement and divorce between the parties, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of the court process.
Yusuf v. State Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside the appellant's conviction under Section 394 IPC due to lack of proper identification and insufficient evidence linking him to the robbery.
Kunal Alias Harsh v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's framing of charges under Section 307 IPC against the petitioner, holding that a prima facie case existed based on the material on record and that detailed evidence evaluation is not required at the charge framing stage.
Arasdeep Singh v. State GNCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 25 of the Arms Act against a petitioner where a single live cartridge was recovered without evidence of conscious possession or criminal intent.
Rajaram v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court modified the appellants' conviction from murder under Section 302 IPC to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part II IPC, holding the death occurred in a sudden fight without premeditation or intention to cause death.
Naval Singh v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition does not lapse if possession is taken and compensation paid, and claims for enhanced compensation must be pursued under the Land Acquisition Act, dismissing the petitioner’s writ petition.
Praveen Kumar Kasana & Ors. v. The State (Govt. of NCT Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs involving minor offences arising from a family dispute after amicable settlement, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process.
Shraddha Shandilyayan v. Livecities Media Private Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court corrected a typographical error in the final order regarding the date of filing an application for condonation of delay but declined to entertain substantive challenges to the validity of the Written Statement filing under Sections 151 and 152 CPC.
Ujjwal Garg v. Commissioner, Department of Trade and Taxes, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing restoration of the petitioner’s GST registration upon compliance with Rule 86B, holding that suspension cannot be maintained on unalleged grounds.
T C Verma & Anr. v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that the three-month limitation for appeals under Section 17 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 is mandatory and the Appellate Authority cannot condone delay under the Limitation Act, quashing the impugned order and directing implementation of the Forest Settlement Officer's land exchange order.
OPG Power Generation Private Limited v. Enexio Power Cooling Solutions India Private Limited
The Supreme Court restored an arbitral award holding that limitation was validly extended by written acknowledgment, joint liability of holding and subsidiary companies was justified, and the award did not violate public policy or suffer patent illegality.
ULTRA-TECH CEMENT LTD. v. MAST RAM & ORS.
The Supreme Court held that compensation liability under a land acquisition proceeding pending before the effective date of a corporate scheme remains with the transferor company, directing the State to pay compensation to landowners and recover from the transferor, setting aside the High Court's order imposing liability on the transferee.
Shoor Singh v. State of Uttarakhand
The Supreme Court acquitted the appellants of dowry death and cruelty charges, holding that the prosecution failed to prove essential ingredients of dowry death beyond reasonable doubt and thus the presumption under Section 113-B Evidence Act did not arise.