Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Munib Iqbal Memon v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court allowed bail to an accused detained for over 11 years in a terrorism case, holding that prolonged trial delay violates the constitutional right to a speedy trial despite statutory bail restrictions under UAPA.
Abhinav Jindal HUF v. Income Tax Officer Ward 54 (1) Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that reassessment notices issued after four years without sanction from the authorities specified in Section 151(1) are invalid, and TOLA does not amend the sanction procedure under the Income Tax Act.
Abhishek Sharma v. Jai Sachdeva
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's denial of maintenance to the wife who left the matrimonial home without sufficient cause, while confirming maintenance awarded to the minor child.
Manish Mahto v. Suman & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's maintenance order under Section 125 CrPC, affirming the wife's entitlement due to cruelty and rejecting the husband's claim of low income and desertion.
Mandeep Kaur v. Directorate of Education & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that recognized private unaided minority schools are statutorily bound under Section 10(1) of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 to implement 6th and 7th CPC pay revisions and benefits at par with government schools, directing payment of arrears with interest.
Gaurav Singh v. Sitaram
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's dismissal of the application to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that possession disputes based on unregistered documents are triable issues not decidable at the threshold.
Bala Rani Bhatia v. Directorate of Education & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that recognized private unaided minority schools are statutorily bound under Section 10(1) of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 to pay their employees salaries and benefits at par with government employees as per 6th and 7th Central Pay Commissions, directing release of arrears and benefits accordingly.
BIOTYX MEDICAL (SHENZHEN) CO. LTD v. THE ASSISTANT CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS
Delhi High Court sets aside patent refusal for an absorbable iron-based alloy medical device, directing reconsideration of inventive step with proper scientific reasoning and methodology.
MD Wazid Raza v. Superintendent Range-108 Central Goods and Service Tax & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the tax authorities to allow the petitioner an opportunity to submit documents before deciding on cancellation of his GST registration following suspension due to alleged non-existence at the declared business address.
Mohd. Shahzad v. New Delhi Municipal Council
The Delhi High Court held that no vending rights can be transmitted to legal heirs if the deceased did not hold a valid license during lifetime, dismissing the petition for transfer of tehbazari rights posthumously.
Mayank Bansal v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court set aside charges against the petitioner for lack of prima facie material linking him to the offence, emphasizing that mere presence without overt acts or common intention cannot attract liability under Section 34 IPC at the charge framing stage.
Sushila Goel v. Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that petitioners compensated for agricultural land allotted in lieu under consolidation proceedings cannot claim compensation for the original subject land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, affirming finality of the consolidation scheme and dismissing their petitions.
Swati Maliwal v. State; Sarika Chaudhary v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld framing of charges against accused for criminal misconduct involving arbitrary appointments and misuse of public funds at DCW, emphasizing the sufficiency of prima facie material at the charge stage.
Someshwar Dayal v. Anupama Dayal
The Delhi High Court held that a party in a civil suit cannot be denied the right to address oral arguments merely because the case is old, directing the trial court to allow the defendant to present oral arguments.
Shree Balaji Laminations v. SR Goyal Polymers
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order allowing amendment of the plaint and impleadment of the true proprietor, dismissing the petition challenging the same.
Shukla Chakraborty v. Snehanshu Das Pandit
The Delhi High Court upheld maintenance of ₹12,000 per month but set aside the show-cause notice under Section 340 CrPC against the petitioner, emphasizing judicial discretion and preventing misuse of false evidence proceedings in matrimonial disputes.
Nawal Kishore Khandelwal v. Anuradha & Ors.
The High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the petition challenging dismissal of an Order VII Rule 11 application with liberty to raise issues at trial and directed expeditious disposal of the suit.
Babita Devi v. Ram Kripal Mall
The High Court directed the Trial Court to prioritize hearing the petitioner's interim injunction application to protect possession and business interests amid urgent demolition threat.
Anil Kulshrestha v. M/S FIITJEE Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash summons under Section 138 NI Act, holding that factual disputes regarding security cheques and contract validity must be tried and cannot be decided at the pre-trial stage.
Manish v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's maintenance award to the wife under Section 125 CrPC, affirming her entitlement due to sufficient cause for living separately and reasonable income assessment of the husband.