Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
ITI Saxena Minor v. MBA International School
The Delhi High Court upheld its order granting provisional admission to the petitioner under the EWS category, directing compliance despite the Directorate of Education's subsequent reallocation and the school's request for seat reduction.
Sayan Sasmal v. Director of Education & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the evaluation of a student's answer sheets, holding that an independent inquiry found no irregularity and academic failure was based on performance.
Govind v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a narcotics case due to discrepancies in seized quantity and prolonged trial, balancing statutory provisions with fundamental rights.
Usha Gupta v. Commissioner of CGST, Delhi South Commissionerate & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that a Show Cause Notice cannot be issued to a deceased sole proprietor and must be directed to the legal representative or person carrying on the business under Section 93 of the CGST Act.
Vivek Narula & Anr v. The State NCT of Delhi and Ors
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 354, 509, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between close relatives, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Charanjeet Singh & Ors. v. State of NCT Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of the court process.
Pankaj Kumar and Another v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Another
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties in a matrimonial dispute, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Baby Ishita Rawat v. Adarsh Public School & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a private unaided school cannot deny admission allotted under the EWS category due to a clerical error in the application form and directed the DoE to allow correction of such errors to uphold the right to education.
Santosh Aggarwal and Ors. v. The State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act following an amicable settlement between the matrimonial parties, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of court process.
Parveen Kumar v. State of Himachal Pradesh
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of a husband for cruelty and abetment of his wife's suicide under Sections 498-A and 306 IPC, affirming the discretionary presumption under Section 113A of the Evidence Act.
Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company Ltd. v. Saroj Kumar Panda
The Supreme Court set aside an ex parte Labour Tribunal award for non-impleadment of the employer company and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication after proper parties are joined and the employee's status is determined.
Just Rights for Children Alliance v. S. Harish
The Supreme Court clarified that possession of child pornography with intent to share or failure to delete is punishable under POCSO and IT Act, set aside the High Court's quashing order, and reinstated criminal proceedings.
Jeevan Adhar Co-operative House Building Society Ltd. v. Chandigarh Housing Board and Anr.
The Supreme Court upheld the NCDRC's order restricting escalation cost payment to 30.04.1997, dismissing the appellant's claim for extension up to 15.10.1998 in execution proceedings.
State of Madhya Pradesh v. Ramji Lal Sharma & Another
The Supreme Court allowed a belated claim of juvenility, set aside the conviction of an accused under IPC Section 302, and acquitted him after a thorough enquiry established he was under 18 at the time of the offence.
YOGARANI v. STATE
The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of charges under Section 420 IPC and Passports Act due to lack of reliable evidence and the acquittal of co-accused on similar charges, emphasizing the principle of parity and the need for corroborated expert evidence.
Gagan Banga and another v. The State of West Bengal and others
The Supreme Court modified and recalled its earlier order granting interim protection against criminal proceedings to financial institutions, emphasizing the need for hearing affected parties and leaving High Courts free to decide on merits independently.
Fuleshwar Gope v. Union of India
The Supreme Court held that sanction under UAPA requires independent review and application of mind, timelines are directory, and challenges to sanction validity are to be decided by the trial court, dismissing the appellant's plea to quash prosecution.
Rupali Bapurao Jadhav v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court rejected anticipatory bail, holding that false assurances of unrealistic profits in share trading by advocate applicants prima facie establish cheating and criminal intent beyond a civil dispute.
Kunal Kamra v. Union of India
The Bombay High Court, in a reference under Clause 36 of the Letters Patent, examined the constitutional validity and statutory vires of the amended Rule 3(1)(b)(v) of the IT Intermediary Guidelines, highlighting key differences in judicial opinion on freedom of speech, natural justice, and proportionality.
Ramkaran Karwa v. Union of India
The Bombay High Court held that seized cash refunded after investigation must carry interest at the actual rate earned on fixed deposits, rejecting the respondents’ reliance on a Circular limiting interest to 6%, and directed refund of excess interest with accountability measures.