Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Govind T Samani v. Ashwin Aloysrus Dsouza & Anr
The Delhi High Court reduced an excessive bond amount fixed by the NCDRC under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, emphasizing that bonds must be reasonable and solely to ensure appearance.
M/S. SHELTER MAKER (I) PVT. LTD. & ORS. v. SHAKUNTALA S. AGARWAL & ORS.
Delhi High Court dismissed a petition challenging NCDRC orders for lack of territorial jurisdiction, directing the petitioner to approach the Bombay High Court as per Supreme Court precedent.
Shelter Maker Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. Anand Mundra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition under Article 227 for lack of jurisdiction, holding that consumer dispute challenges must be filed before the High Court where the cause of action arose, as per Supreme Court precedent.
Shelter Maker Pvt Ltd & Ors. v. Babulal M Parekh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition under Article 227 for lack of jurisdiction, holding that consumer dispute petitions must be filed before the High Court where the cause of action arose.
Shelter Maker I Pvt Ltd & Ors. v. Kamalkumar S Bhagheria & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition under Article 227 for lack of territorial jurisdiction, holding that challenges to NCDRC orders must be filed before the High Court where the cause of action arose.
Shelter Maker I Pvt Ltd & Ors. v. Ajit Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition under Article 227 for lack of territorial jurisdiction, reaffirming that consumer dispute petitions must be filed in the High Court where the cause of action arises.
Shelter Maker (I) Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. Santosh V Agarwal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition under Article 227 for lack of jurisdiction, holding that the petitioners must approach the High Court where the cause of action arose, in line with Supreme Court precedent.
Shelter Maker I Pvt Ltd & Ors. v. Rameshbhai R Shah & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition under Article 227 for lack of jurisdiction, holding that the petition must be filed before the High Court having territorial jurisdiction over the cause of action.
Azimuddin v. Gagan Chandela
The Delhi High Court directed that evidence in two cross suits be recorded before the Trial Court itself instead of a Local Commissioner, dismissing the petition challenging the appointment to ensure expeditious disposal.
Mr. B P Singh Chauhan v. Vijender Singh
The Delhi High Court held that courts have discretion under Section 149 CPC to extend time for deposit of deficient Court Fee despite plaintiff's delay, and refusal to impose costs is not liable to interference.
Aamir Naseer v. Mohammad Zulfiquar
The High Court held that dismissal of an application for production of documents does not bar summoning a government official to prove the document during trial and allowed the petitioner to summon the official with costs.
Khokhar v. Syed Anzar Shah
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's delayed appeal under Section 21 of the NIA Act against discharge in a UAPA case, holding that delay beyond the statutory 90-day limit cannot be condoned under the Limitation Act.
Yasir Ayaz v. State of NCT Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court recognized the UK High Court’s welfare jurisdiction over British children wrongfully retained in India and directed compliance with the UK court’s order for their contact and production.
Sama Jahan @ Shama Parveen v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of a widowed daughter-in-law, upholding the order directing her to pay monthly maintenance to her senior citizen mother-in-law under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007.
Arti Ghosh @ Aroti Ghosh v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that mutation and conversion of leasehold property in favor of a legatee under a registered Will in Delhi do not require probate or Letters of Administration and directed the DDA to carry out mutation and conversion accordingly.
Sparsh Dhir v. Esha Dhir
The Delhi High Court dismissed a contempt petition alleging denial of visitation rights, directing the Family Court to monitor and ensure compliance for the child's welfare.
Mahaveer Prasad v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of a police constable for rash and negligent driving causing death, affirming the credibility of eyewitness testimony and emphasizing deterrent sentencing.
Ravi Shukla v. State NCT of Delhi
Pre-arrest bail was denied to the accused in a commercial quantity NDPS case due to prima facie involvement and necessity of custodial interrogation for effective investigation.
Novel Trade Links LLP & Ors. v. Delhi Development Authority & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the DDA and revenue authorities to cooperate for demarcation and mutation of land records in an urbanized village, affirming that revenue jurisdiction persists post-urbanization to protect property rights.
Narender Meena v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of a jail official accused of custodial death, holding that prima facie evidence and risk of witness tampering justified denial of bail.