Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Viphil Jain v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail for the kingpin of a spurious anti-cancer injection racket, holding that his central role and risk of evidence tampering outweigh parity with co-accused granted bail.
Rustam Beg (Deceased) Thr Lrs v. Union of India & Ors
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file additional documents belatedly in a suit for permanent injunction, emphasizing judicial discretion and fairness while imposing costs for delay.
Mahender Singh & Ors. v. Hukam Chand
The Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to grant an effective opportunity for cross-examination when affidavits were supplied on the same day contrary to its own order for advance copy, emphasizing procedural fairness.
M/S SPELL ORGANICS LTD v. M/S APSOM TURNER PVT LTD & ANR
The High Court allowed the petitioner’s challenge to the deletion of a defendant under Order I Rule 10 CPC, permitting the defendant to lead evidence and directing the Trial Court to decide mis-joinder issues afresh.
Bhim Singh v. Ram Kumar
The High Court set aside the Trial Court's cryptic order granting conditional leave to defend under Order XXXVII CPC and directed a fresh, reasoned consideration of the application.
CS Construction Company Pvt Ltd v. Excelling Geo and Engineering Consultant Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the DIAC coordinator's administrative order reassessing arbitrator's fees separately for claim and counter claim, dismissing the appeal for lack of jurisdictional error or exceptional circumstances.
Suhail Ahmed Khan v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that the hereditary appointment of the Shahi Imam and his son lacks legal validity without Wakf Board ratification and directed authorities to ensure proper management and protection of Jama Masjid.
Vishnu Verma and Ors v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a dowry harassment FIR following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of court process.
Sunny Anand & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of the court process.
Karan Tejpaul & Anr v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354A, 506, 509, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Kajol Gupta v. Sarthak Jain
The Delhi High Court granted the petitioner one final limited opportunity to conclude cross-examination in a divorce proceeding despite prior refusals, imposing costs for delay.
Varun Gupta v. Suman Grover & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner limited cross-examination on a subsequently filed certificate under Section 65-B Indian Evidence Act and disposed of related petitions in a recovery suit.
Sawan Khokhar & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties, holding that continuing criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Union of India v. Mahender Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT’s order setting aside disciplinary punishment imposed without furnishing UPSC advice to the charged officer, reaffirming the requirement of natural justice in disciplinary proceedings.
Manisha Ravindra Panpatil v. The State of Maharashtra
The Supreme Court set aside the summary removal of a woman Sarpanch based on unverified allegations, emphasizing the need for proper inquiry and protection against discriminatory administrative actions.
LAKHA SINGH v. BALWINDER SINGH
The Supreme Court set aside concurrent judgments upholding a disputed agreement to sell agricultural land, finding the agreement fabricated and the findings of fact perverse, thereby allowing the appeal and dismissing the suit.
Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited v. M/s Sanman Rice Mills
The Supreme Court held that appellate courts under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act have limited jurisdiction confined to grounds under Section 34 and cannot reappraise evidence or substitute their view for the arbitrator's, restoring the arbitral award set aside by the High Court.
Sanjay Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh
The Supreme Court upheld the imposition of a censure entry on a police officer's service record, holding that the procedure under the Uttar Pradesh Police Officers Rules, 1991 and principles of natural justice were duly followed.
Ahmednagar District Central Cooperative Bank Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra
The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's belated challenge to an auction sale of cooperative society property, upholding the sale to a statutory body while directing payment of dues to the appellant under Article 142.
RBL Bank Ltd v. Sohanlal V. Jain (HUF) & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that setting aside an ex-parte decree restores the suit and the timeline for filing a Section 8 arbitration application runs from restoration, thus upholding the referral to arbitration despite delay in filing written statement.