Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
M/S ASSOCIATED TUBES v. ANIL SINGHAL
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging an arbitral award, holding that judicial interference under the Arbitration Act is limited and the award was within the scope of arbitration and free from patent illegality.
Rakesh Khanna v. Naveen Kumar Aggarwal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld arrest warrants against a company director for non-compliance with a Consumer Commission order, affirming that liability arises from directorship at enforcement time under Section 72 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019.
The Commissioner of Income Tax – International Taxation -2 v. Mavenir UK Holdings
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the ITAT's decision to set aside a final assessment order passed beyond the mandatory time limit prescribed under Section 144C(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
KURU AGRI PRODUCTS & ORS. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the guidelines and procedures for registration of poppy seed import contracts from Turkey, holding that the registration and allocation process is governed by the India-Turkey MoU and lies beyond Indian jurisdiction, with no substantiated fraud warranting judicial intervention.
NS Associates Pvt Ltd v. New Delhi Municipal Council
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 after the petitioner demonstrated compliance with the contract's dispute resolution mechanism.
CARS 24 FINANCIAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED v. NAZIR HOSSAIN & ANR.
The Delhi High Court appointed a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate disputes under a Credit Facility Agreement, directing compliance with Section 12 disclosures and allowing preliminary jurisdictional objections before the arbitrator.
CARS 24 FINANCIAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED v. AMIT SINGH SHEKHAWAT & ANR
The Delhi High Court appointed a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate disputes under a Credit Facility Agreement, affirming the court's power to appoint arbitrators where arbitration clauses exist and parties fail to agree.
CARS 24 FINANCIAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED v. KOLLIVELASI SRINIVAS KUMAR & ANR.
The Delhi High Court appointed a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate disputes under a Credit Facility Agreement, affirming the mandatory nature of arbitration clauses and procedural rights of parties.
CARS 24 FINANCIAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED v. SHIJNA S & ANR
The Delhi High Court appointed a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate disputes under a Credit Facility Agreement containing an arbitration clause, affirming the mandatory nature of such appointment despite non-response by respondents.
CARS 24 FINANCIAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED v. SR CAR BAZAR & ORS
The Delhi High Court appointed a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate disputes under a Credit Facility Agreement, affirming the mandatory nature of arbitration clause enforcement and procedural rights of parties.
CARS 24 FINANCIAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED v. MOHD ALI MAHMOOD & ANR
The Delhi High Court appointed a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate disputes under a Credit Facility Agreement, affirming the mandatory nature of arbitration clause enforcement and procedural rights of parties.
Amit Kumar Sharma v. NTPC and Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging NTPC's 2008 Law Officer selection process, holding that the Interview Board's decision on suitability is not subject to judicial interference absent mala fide or arbitrariness and that the petitioner cannot claim a reserved category vacancy.
Chandra Bhushan v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed the petitioner's adverse APARs and related orders due to reliance on an expunged advisory issued beyond the assessment period and procedural irregularities in recording adverse remarks.
Padam Singh Chauhan v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking compassionate allowance for a BSF constable dismissed for habitual absence without leave, holding that misconduct and delay barred relief under Rule 41 of the CCS Pension Rules.
Amit Kumar Gupta v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging adverse APAR entries, holding no reasonable likelihood of bias by the reporting officer and affirming the importance of objective and fair performance appraisals.
Ravi Bajaj Designs Pvt. Ltd. v. Arun Aggarwal
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal in a commercial suit, holding that the appellant failed to prove return of goods or produce original documents, thereby upholding the Trial Court's decree for recovery of outstanding payment.
M/S AJIT MOTORS v. NEM SINGH
The Delhi High Court disposed of a labour dispute appeal by recording a lawful settlement agreement reached through mediation, binding the parties and precluding further claims.
Vijay Singh v. State of Bihar
The Supreme Court acquitted all accused in a murder and abduction case due to unreliable eyewitness testimony, failure to prove residence and motive, and improper reversal of acquittal by the High Court.
Shoyeb Raja v. State of Madhya Pradesh
The Supreme Court held that charges under Section 307 IPC must be framed if prima facie material indicates intent to cause death, even if injuries are minor, and set aside acquittal to direct trial on merits.
In Re: Remarks by High Court Judge During Court Proceedings
The Supreme Court addressed inappropriate remarks made by a High Court Judge during live-streamed proceedings, accepted the Judge's apology, and emphasized the need for judicial impartiality and decorum in the digital age without imposing further sanctions.