Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Anheuser Busch InBev India Ltd. v. Ajay Tyagi
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellate court's order requiring the petitioner to deposit 20% of the fine amount as a condition for suspension of sentence under Section 138 NI Act, holding that exceptions to this deposit condition require specific reasons and supporting evidence.
Anheuser Busch InBev India Ltd. v. Ajay Tyagi
The Delhi High Court upheld the mandatory deposit of 20% of the fine under Section 148 NI Act as a condition for suspension of sentence pending appeal, dismissing the petitioner's claim of financial incapacity without supporting evidence.
Aktiebolaget Volvo & Ors. v. Lamina Suspension Products Limited
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction against unauthorized use of 'VOLVO' and 'FMX' trademarks on leaf springs, allowing limited descriptive use with disclaimers under a summary judgment based on parties' settlement.
Galaxy IEC India Private Limited v. DCM Shriram Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that at the appointment stage under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, the Court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed a Sole Arbitrator despite respondent's objections on arbitrability.
M/S STAR SHARES & STOCK BROKERS LTD v. PRAVEEN GUPTA & ANR
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award, affirming limited judicial interference under Section 34 and upholding the arbitral tribunal’s discretion in awarding interest and deciding claims on merits.
Jagdish Kumar v. Ramjani @ Kailash & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the motor accident claim appeal, enhancing compensation by assessing 100% functional disability for a commercial driver with 90% physical disability, emphasizing occupation-based loss of earning capacity.
Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co. Ltd v. Zeenat Khan and Others
The Delhi High Court modified a motor accident compensation award by applying a multiplier of 15 for a deceased child under 15 years, upheld calculation of notional income based on minimum wages, and maintained interest at 9% per annum.
BOSCH LTD. v. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE & ANR
The Delhi High Court directed the authority to reconsider the petitioner's MEIS claim on merits despite procedural omission in shipping bills, allowing amendment and personal hearing before a speaking order.
BOSCH CHASSIS SYSTEM INDIA PVT. LTD. v. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE
Delhi High Court directed re-examination of MEIS claims where procedural omission occurred, mandating personal hearing and speaking order to ensure just administrative decision.
TV Today Network Limited and Others v. Sanatan Sanstha and Others
The Delhi High Court disposed of the suit against defendant no. 3 on his undertaking, passed permanent and mandatory injunctions against defendants no. 1 and 2, and allowed withdrawal of damages claim against defendant no. 1 while reserving damages claim against defendant no. 2.
Deepinder Singh Bedi & Anr. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that dishonour of a cheque due to the drawer's bank account being frozen by the Income Tax Department does not attract liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and quashed the complaint accordingly.
Vipula Chandhok & Ors. v. Kulbir Singh Chandhok & Ors.
The court held that the suit property remained undivided as per the Gift Deed, validated sale deeds transferring undivided shares under Section 43 TPA, and granted a preliminary decree of partition defining shares accordingly.
SI Anju v. Krishan Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld anticipatory bail granted to the accused in a sexual assault case, emphasizing that bail cancellation requires cogent reasons beyond mere presence in CCTV footage or parity with co-accused.
Corrtech International Pvt. Ltd. v. Delhi International Arbitration Center & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging arbitration under the MSMED Act, holding that jurisdictional and procedural objections must be raised before the arbitral tribunal, and judicial interference under Articles 226/227 is permissible only in exceptional circumstances.
Hans Nagar v. John Nagar & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition holding that the respondents did not violate status quo orders limited to two rooms and lawfully sold their own property.
Manoj Kumar Jain v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that delay in filing a Revision Petition before the NCDRC can be condoned if the petitioner had pursued a bona fide Review Petition with due diligence, and limitation should be reckoned from the disposal of the Review Petition.
Tiddim Road Athletic Union Trau Football Club v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld AIFF's mandatory relegation of two football clubs, ruling no judicial interference is warranted absent arbitrariness or mala fide in sports federation decisions governed by clear contractual rules.
Vidushi Kasniya v. University of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the University of Delhi's policy excluding Karate from the sports quota for M.A. Psychology admissions, ruling that such policy decisions are discretionary and not violative of Article 14.
Union of India v. M/S Satish Builders
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award granting compensation for delay-related claims, rejecting the petitioner's challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act for lack of patent illegality or public policy violation.
Sunayna Sabharwal v. The State NCT of Delhi & Ors.
Complaint alleging forgery and misappropriation in insurance policy dismissed for lack of original documents and cogent evidence, upholding contractual terms and requiring prima facie proof for criminal cognizance.