Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Satish Motiani & Ors. v. T Choithram Foundation & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a suit by a public charitable trust against alleged usurpers is maintainable without prior leave under Section 92 CPC and limitation cannot be summarily decided at the plaint rejection stage.
Employees State Insurance Corporation and Ors. v. Mohit Kumar Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld the employer's right to prescribe minimum qualifying marks after the examination but before result declaration, rejecting the challenge to post-exam fixation of cut-off marks as not arbitrary or violative of fundamental rights.
Technology Information Forecasting and Assessment Council v. Strategic Engineering Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award for patent illegality, holding that repayment obligations under a technology development agreement arise upon AMC's certification of successful technology development, not contingent on commercial viability.
Sanjiv Narula v. Pargat Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking to file additional documents at a late stage in a long-pending suit, emphasizing that procedural rules cannot be used to delay justice.
Ganesh v. Vanketesh & Ors.
The High Court upheld the trial court’s order allowing delayed filing of Written Statement due to the plaintiff’s failure to supply the paperbook, dismissing the petitioner’s challenge.
Prem Prakash v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of the appellant for aggravated sexual assault on a 5-year-old child based on credible and consistent testimony of the victim without requiring corroboration.
Shamroz Khan & Ors. v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under dowry harassment and related IPC sections based on an amicable settlement and divorce between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Siya Ram v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 288, 337, and 304A IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.
Shri Dineshwar Nath Kedar v. M/S Gopal Dass and Sons
The Delhi High Court allowed the landlord's eviction petition under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that the bona fide requirement was genuine and alternative accommodations were not reasonably suitable.
Nakul Sharma v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279, 304A, and 337 IPC based on an amicable settlement and exercised inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.
Prateek Raj Mathur and Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed FIR No. 217/2024 and all proceedings based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.
Navneet Kumar & Anr. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR involving forgery and cheating based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure the ends of justice.
Maxwell Singh v. The State of NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279 and 304A IPC based on an amicable settlement and exercised its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and serve the ends of justice.
SK Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed appeals challenging cognizance and refused to quash FIR alleging offences under IPC and SC/ST Act, holding that sufficient material existed for trial and inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC should be sparingly exercised.
Sachin Bajpai v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court stayed a notice summoning an advocate during investigation, reaffirming client-advocate privilege and procedural safeguards against summoning lawyers without proper grounds.
Sachin @ Atul v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the conviction of the appellant for robbery with a deadly weapon under Sections 392/34 read with 397 IPC based on credible eyewitness and complainant testimony corroborated by recovery of weapon and stolen property.
Sh. Sonu v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of a stepfather for sexual offences against his minor stepdaughter, affirming that credible child witness testimony alone can sustain conviction under the POCSO Act.
ARIAT INTERNATIONAL INC. v. SUNGLASS PALACE INDIA PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court granted interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act directing the respondent to disclose sales details to preserve the subject matter of an international commercial arbitration dispute involving alleged breach of territorial restrictions.
Jawaharlal Malhotra & Anr v. State & Ors
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and set aside the probate granted on a disputed Will due to unresolved suspicious circumstances and non-compliance with Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.
Malaya Kumar Chand v. Prem Kumar Verma & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff’s appeal against refusal of interim injunction in a property dispute involving contested title and long-standing possession, holding that disputed title and forgery allegations cannot be conclusively decided at the interlocutory stage.