Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Union of India v. Ajay Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting disability pension to a serviceman who reasonably refused surgery despite a reduced disability percentage.
Surinder Kaur & Anr. v. FIITJEE Limited
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the Court’s role is limited to a prima facie examination of the existence of an arbitration agreement without delving into arbitrability or merits.
M/S HIGHWAY ENGINEERING CONSULTANT v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator to continue arbitration proceedings after the arbitral tribunal became non-functional due to the resignation of the presiding arbitrator.
SURYAKIRAN INFO PVT LTD v. KALTECH BUILDING CONTROLS PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a contract containing an arbitration clause, keeping all substantive rights open for the arbitrator's decision.
Paramjit Singh v. FIITJEE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, the Court's role is limited to prima facie satisfaction of an arbitration agreement's existence and appointed an arbitrator accordingly, leaving substantive disputes to arbitration.
Paramjit Singh v. FIITJEE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 after prima facie finding the existence of an arbitration agreement, emphasizing limited judicial scrutiny at this stage.
Mr Dharmendra Kumar Singh v. Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Limited
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, the Court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed the sole arbitrator as per the contract to adjudicate disputes arising from a vehicle loan agreement.
Salam @ Shah Alam v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for armed robbery under Sections 392/397/34 IPC but modified the sentence to release him on probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, emphasizing reformative justice despite the mandatory minimum sentence under Section 397 IPC.
Surender Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for grievous injury and criminal intimidation but modified the sentence to release him on probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, emphasizing reformative justice.
UPGRID SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. v. SANJAY NAGAR, SOLE PROPRIETOR, SANJAY E RICKSHAW PARKING
The High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, granting liberty to amend the suit prayers under Order VI Rule 17 CPC, holding that interim applications cannot contain prayers beyond the main suit.
Lt Col Bharat Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that petitions challenging adverse remarks and seeking promotion do not automatically merit priority hearing over other urgent cases involving Armed Forces personnel and dismissed the petitioner’s request for advancement of hearing.
Lalit Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that no separate finding is required on a charge that merely reiterates other charges and allowed condonation of delay but dismissed the review petition seeking such finding.
Chetan Vats @ Chetan & Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and divorce between the parties.
Sheeba; Mohammed Salik v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the non-evaluation of candidates' answer sheets due to incorrect bubbling of roll numbers, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural requirements in selection exams.
Moazzam Ali & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and dissolution of marriage by Mubarat.
Vicky & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) through S.H.O. Jaitpur & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, exercising inherent powers to promote reconciliation and prevent abuse of process.
Deepak Minda & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The High Court held that only the Public Prosecutor or the Court can move applications under Section 311 CrPC to recall witnesses, and a private complainant cannot independently do so without statutory permission, setting aside the trial court's order allowing such an application by the complainant.
Rajesh Kumar v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 354 IPC but commuted the sentence to the period already served considering mitigating factors and prolonged trial delay.
Som Nath v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under the Essential Commodities Act but reduced the sentence to the period already served considering mitigating circumstances and prolonged litigation.
Shekh Rafiq v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's bail application in a murder case, holding that a prima facie case exists and the petitioner's conduct and identification by witnesses weigh against bail despite trial delays.