Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Gulshan Kumar v. Institute of Banking Personnel Selection
The Supreme Court held that all persons with disabilities are entitled to reasonable accommodations like scribes and compensatory time in examinations, directing the government to revise guidelines to ensure non-discriminatory, uniform implementation and grievance redressal.
The State of Jharkhand v. Sunny Kumar @ Sunny Kumar Sao
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's bail order under the NDPS Act after the accused was subsequently involved in another similar offence, emphasizing the need for strict scrutiny in bail matters and speedy trial.
Godrej Projects Development Limited v. Anil Karlekar & Ors.
The Supreme Court upheld limiting earnest money forfeiture to 10% of the Basic Sale Price in a real estate cancellation, declaring a 20% forfeiture clause unreasonable and setting aside interest awarded on the refund.
Jai Ram v. Som Prakash
The Supreme Court held that limitation objections not raised before the trial court cannot be entertained for the first time in appeal, restoring the revocation of Letters of Administration granted on a revoked will.
Vijay Sharma v. Vivek Makhija
The Bombay High Court allowed the Section 11 application appointing an arbitrator, holding that stamp duty adequacy issues are for the arbitral tribunal and prior procedural orders do not bar fresh arbitration applications.
Ram Kishor Arora; Mohit Arora; Sangita Arora v. ICICI Bank; Reserve Bank of India; Supertech Township Projects Ltd
The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging ICICI Bank's fraud classification order for lack of jurisdiction, holding that the Delhi High Court is the appropriate forum and that filing in Bombay amounts to forum shopping.
Shri. Vitthal Laxman Patil v. Kores (India) Ltd. & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that a promoter cannot construct an additional building on the recreational ground shown in the sanctioned layout plan without the prior consent of flat purchasers, affirming the promoter's duty of disclosure and adherence to MOFA provisions.
Shri Prashant s/o Subhash Bedse v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court quashed the belated suspension of a Tahsildar lacking material justification and directed reconsideration of the challenged transfer order by the Administrative Tribunal.
Brijesh Kumar Srivastava & Ors. v. The Union of India & Ors.
The Bombay High Court allowed the writ petition to condone delay in filing an application for interest on delayed payments to Naval Dockyard employees, emphasizing that plausible explanations for delay must be liberally considered.
Vicky Bharat Kalyani v. The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
The Bombay High Court referred to a Larger Bench the interpretation of Sections 50, 41, and 41A Cr.P.C. concerning procedural safeguards during arrest, emphasizing the need for uniformity and protection of fundamental rights.
Avinash Ajay Benewal v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court granted bail to an 18-year-old accused in a robbery case, emphasizing rehabilitation and education continuity under the Probation of Offenders Act.
M/s. Atria Constructions v. The Municipal Commis, Pune
The Bombay High Court quashed a municipal stop work notice issued without jurisdiction and natural justice, holding that construction under valid environmental clearance cannot be deemed illegal merely due to pending revised clearance applications, and directed issuance of occupancy certificate pending arbitration of private disputes.
MIS. TATA ALDESA (JV) v. MIS. DEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to extend the Arbitral Tribunal's mandate till 31 January 2025 under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, with no objection from the respondent.
TATA ALDESA (JV) v. DEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to extend the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 till 31 January 2025 to enable proper adjudication of disputes.
SPML Infra Limited v. Delhi Jal Board
The Delhi High Court granted an extension of the Arbitral Tribunal's mandate under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, allowing the tribunal to continue proceedings until 31 January 2025.
Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-2 v. Genpact Consulting (Singapore) Pte Ltd
The Delhi High Court allowed correction of typographical errors in a tax judgment, clarifying statutory references and company names, and held that revising an assessment based on liability of a different entity is unsustainable.
Manoj v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld the cancellation of a paramilitary appointment offer due to the candidate's failure to join within prescribed timelines despite extensions, holding that personal hardships do not justify indefinite delay.
Public Works Department, Govt of NCT of Delhi v. M/S Sagar Constructions
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the dismissal of a Section 34 arbitration application filed beyond limitation and held that filing before a court lacking territorial jurisdiction does not extend limitation period.
NATCO PHARMA LIMITED v. KUDOS PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED & ORS.
The Delhi High Court dismissed an appeal against an interim injunction restraining manufacture of a drug based on an expired patent, holding that such injunctions lose practical relevance post patent expiry and do not prejudice trial proceedings.
Yogender Kumar Pathak v. UOI & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the delayed review petition of a railway employee challenging seniority revision following his transfer on own request, affirming that such transfers result in loss of seniority and that review jurisdiction is limited to correcting patent errors.