Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Liyakat Ali v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of a police constable for attempted murder using his service revolver, rejecting his plea of self-defence and false implication.
Khanna and Annadhanam v. Commissioner of Income Tax
The Delhi High Court held that compensation received for termination of a long-standing professional referral arrangement is a capital receipt and not taxable as professional income.
Zulfikar Ali v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and death sentence of the appellant, affirming that the death penalty is warranted only in the rarest of rare cases with conclusive evidence.
Mubin Fatima v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and death sentence of the appellant, affirming the application of the 'rarest of rare' doctrine and procedural safeguards in capital punishment cases.
State v. Kumari Mubin Fatima & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the death sentence and conviction due to the unreliability of the dying declaration recorded without medical certification or proof of fitness of the deceased to make the statement.
Manoj Kumar v. B.S.E.S. Yamuna Power Ltd
The Delhi High Court disposed of writ petitions challenging disputed bills on condition of partial deposit and allowed petitioners to approach the Special Court, restraining coercive action temporarily.
Jyot Impex v. Customs Authorities
The Delhi High Court directed customs authorities to release consignments of used tyres without requiring environmental clearance certificates when the Pollution Control Committee has indicated no such certificate is necessary.
Sat Narayan v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal as it did not survive for consideration in view of a binding Coordinate Bench decision.
Ratan Lal v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal as it did not survive for consideration in view of a prior Coordinate Bench decision.
Suraj Prakash Singh v. Kamlesh Prakash & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the execution petition as infructuous and disposed of the partition suit, holding that obligations of a non-party builder cannot keep the proceedings pending.
Sanjeev Kumar @ Sanjay Verma v. State
The Delhi High Court granted pre-arrest bail to petitioners in a case involving serious IPC offences after investigation completion, making interim protection absolute subject to bail conditions.
GE CAPITAL SERVICES INDIA v. ANIL SINGHAL
The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of a Section 138 NI Act complaint for non-appearance, restoring the complaint upon sufficient cause shown by the petitioner.
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd v. Commissioner of Value Added Tax
The Delhi High Court reduced the pre-deposit amounts required from a Central Government enterprise under the Delhi VAT Act to enable appeals against tax and penalty demands to be heard on merits.
International Amusement Ltd. v. Assistant Collector & Anr.
Judgment in writ petitions filed by International Amusement Ltd. against Assistant Collector reserved and pronounced by Delhi High Court on January 29, 2013.
M/S INDERSONS MOTORS P. LTD. v. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER-II & ANR.
The Delhi High Court quashed orders clubbing two distinct establishments under the Employees' Provident Funds Act for lack of natural justice and insufficient evidence of common control.
Manoj Kumar Gupta v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld a transfer order of a government employee to Kochi despite his daughter's disability, holding that transfer is a condition of service and courts will not interfere absent mala fide or statutory violation.
Yogendra Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the Railway Board's voluntary retirement scheme terms, ruling that reservation benefits under the Persons with Disabilities Act apply only to direct recruitment and cannot modify employment provisions for wards under the scheme.
Om Prakash Sharma v. Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board
The Delhi High Court directed the respondent to consider allotting alternative accommodation to the appellant for a dangerous property, setting aside the earlier order rejecting such relief.