Manoj Kumar v. B.S.E.S. Yamuna Power Ltd

Delhi High Court · 29 Jan 2013 · 2013:DHC:7135
G. S. Sistani
W.P.(C) Nos. 488, 515, 523 & 468/2013
2013:DHC:7135
civil appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court disposed of writ petitions challenging disputed bills on condition of partial deposit and allowed petitioners to approach the Special Court, restraining coercive action temporarily.

Full Text
Translation output
371 44, 46 & 48$- HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 488/2013 & CM.934/2013
MANOJ KUMAR
Through:
VERSUS
..... Petitioner Mr.Kshitiz Mahipal, Advocate
B.S.E.S. YAMUNA POWER LTD ..... Respondent
Through: Mr.K.Dutta, 1\dvocate
W.P. (C) 515/2013 & CM.985/2013
SANJAY KUMAR
Through:
VERSUS
Through: Mr.K.Dutta, Advocate
W.P.(C) 523/2013 & CM.997/2013
SANJAY KUMAR
Through:
VERSUS
Mr.Kshitiz ~llahipal, Advocate
Through: Mr.K.DJtta, Advocate
W.P.(C) 468/2013 & CM.905!2013
MANOJKUMAR
Through:
VERSUS
Through: Mr.K.Dutta, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI
29.01.2013 Counsel for the respondent subm'ts that the petitioner has fai,~d =c disclose before the court that these matters stand settled before the .~'leg,:;
Lok Adalat and further the remedy of the petitioner lies before the Speci~
Court.
2013:DHC:7135 Counsel for the petitioners disputes that the matters stand seEied before the Mega Lok Adalat, however, counsel for the petitioners see <s leave of this court to approach the Special Court.
It is agreed by counsel for the parties that subject to petitioners' depositing 25% of the bill amount within ten days from today, no coercive steps will be taken against the petitioners. Ordered accordingly.
All petitions and applications stand disposed of, in above terms. t.!l objections of the petitioners and the respondent are kept open.
DASTI to counsel for the parties.
JANUARY 29, 2013 ssn W.P.(C)Nos.488, 515, 523 & 468/2013 2!2
2013:DHC:7135
JUDGMENT