Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Ajay Sharma v. Mohinder Paul Singh
The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff's appeal permitting belated filing of witness list and reopening of evidence in a suit for specific performance, subject to payment of costs, emphasizing the court's discretion to balance procedural compliance with interests of justice.
Indu Bala v. Idea Cellular Ltd
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 due to the respondent's failure to nominate an arbitrator in a tenancy dispute governed by an arbitration clause.
Ravinder Kumar Thakur v. State
The Delhi High Court set aside the appellant's conviction under Section 397 IPC as he did not use a deadly weapon, while upholding his conviction under Sections 392 and 394 IPC.
The Indian Performing Right Society Ltd v. Gauhati Town Club & Anr
The Delhi High Court held it has territorial jurisdiction and granted permanent injunction restraining defendants from unauthorized public performance of plaintiff's copyrighted musical works without license.
Neelam & Anr v. Sada Ram & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit for partition of properties claimed as ancestral, holding that properties inherited post the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 are self-acquired and do not confer birthright shares to descendants absent a pleaded coparcenary.
Harish & Ors. v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC, holding that a settlement obtained without the complainant's free consent cannot be a ground for quashing criminal proceedings.
th January, 2013 KAPIL DUTT BALI..... Petitioner Through Mr. Sibo Sankar Mishra, Advocate. v. THE UOI & ANR.....
The Delhi High Court dismissed a belated writ petition challenging a 1994 detention order upheld by the Supreme Court, emphasizing finality and rejecting fresh grounds raised after nearly two decades due to delay and laches.
Mohd. Aslam v. K.K. Aggarwal
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking termination of the sole arbitrator's mandate, holding that delay and a police complaint do not justify such termination when objections can be raised before the arbitrator or under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
Hari Om v. State
The Delhi High Court held that a valid school admission certificate is conclusive proof of juvenility under the Juvenile Justice Act and set aside the conviction based on ossification test evidence.
SHEELADEVI v. STATE
The High Court allowed withdrawal of the bail application with liberty to the petitioner to seek bail before the Sessions Court after the prosecution filed a charge-sheet.
Madhur Bhargava v. Arati Bhargava
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a bona fide family arrangement modifying property rights post-partition, dismissing claims of fraud and undue influence, and affirmed possession rights of the sisters over the disputed terrace portions.
Arati Bhargava v. Madhur Bhargava
Judgment pronouncing the decision on multiple appeals involving the Bhargava family and associated entities before the Delhi High Court on January 30, 2013.
MS. ARATI BHARGAVA AND ANR. v. MRS. MADHUR BHARGAVA AND ORS.
The Delhi High Court clarified appellate standards in civil property and business disputes, emphasizing deference to trial court findings and proper entitlement to relief.
Arati Bhargava v. Madhur Bhargava
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeals, affirming the lower courts' findings on ownership and management rights in a complex property and business dispute, emphasizing evidentiary standards and procedural compliance.
D.E. Shaw Composite Investments (Mauritius) Ltd v. Amar Ujala Publications Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw investment-related petitions as the petitioner had transferred its entire shareholding, rendering the dispute infructuous, while permitting other respondents to pursue independent claims.
Alka Arora v. NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR against the petitioner under Sections 498A and 406 IPC following an amicable settlement with the complainant, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
GE CAPITAL TRANSPORTATION FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD. v. BHAGWANDAS AUTO FINANCE LTD.
The Delhi High Court dismissed six criminal miscellaneous petitions as not pressed following a settlement between GE Capital Transportation Financial Services Ltd. and Bhagwandas Auto Finance Ltd.
Ajay Enterprises Pvt Ltd & Anr v. SKBansal & Anr
The High Court dismissed the criminal petition as withdrawn following a settlement between the parties, disposing of all pending applications.
D.E. Shaw Composite Investments (Mauritius) Ltd v. Amar Ujala Publications Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw investment-related petitions as the petitioner had transferred its shares, rendering the disputes infructuous, while permitting other shareholders to pursue independent claims.
Neelam & Anr. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking police protection as the petitioners did not appear and had withdrawn their apprehension following parental acceptance of their marriage.