GE CAPITAL TRANSPORTATION FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD. v. BHAGWANDAS AUTO FINANCE LTD.

Delhi High Court · 30 Jan 2013 · 2013:DHC:6832
Sunil Gaur
CRL.M.C. 2462/2009
2013:DHC:6832
criminal appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed six criminal miscellaneous petitions as not pressed following a settlement between GE Capital Transportation Financial Services Ltd. and Bhagwandas Auto Finance Ltd.

Full Text
Translation output
/'\-
$-11 to 16
* IN THE HIGH COURT QF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CRL.M.C. 246212009 & Crl. M.A. Nos.8365/2009 & 8366/2009
GE CAPITAL TRANSPORTATION FINA}ICIAL SERVICES
LTD. ..... Petitioner
Through: IvIr. P.S. Thenthingala, Advocate
VERSUS
BHAGWANDAS AUTO FINANCE LTD. & ORS. ..Respondents
Through: Mr. Nikhil Goel & Mr. Shivraj
Gaonkar, Advocates
+ CRL.M.C. 246712009 & Crl. M.A. Nos. 8376/2009 & 8375/2009
GE CAPITAL TRANSPORTATION FINANCIAL SERVICES
Through: Mr. P.S. Thenthingala, Advocate
VETSUS
BHAGWANDAS AUTO FINANCE LTD. & ORS. .. Respondents
Gaonkar. Advocates
CRL.M.C. 247412009 &Crl. M.A. Nos. 8389/2009 & 8390/2009
GE CAPITAL TRANSPORTATION FINANCIAL SERVICES
LTD. Petitioner
VERSUS
BHAGWANDAS AUTO FINANCE LTD. & ORS.... Respondents
Gaonkar" Advocates
,, Crl. M.C. Nos.2462; 2467;2474;2497; 2512 & 2513 of 2009 Page L
2013:DHC:6832 gb t
CRL.M.C. 249712009 & Crl. M.A.Nos.8435/2009 & 8436/2009
GE CAPITAL TRA].{SPORTATION FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD. ..... Petitioner
VERSUS
BHAGWAIIDAS AUTO FINANCE LTD. & ORS.... Respondents
Through: Mr. Nikhil Goel & NIr. Shivraj
+ CRL.M.C. 251212009 & Crl. M.A. Nos. 8465/2009 & 8466/2009
GE CAPITAL TRANSPORTATION FINA}ICIAL SERVICES
VERSUS
BHAGWANDAS AUTO FINANCE LTD. & ORS. .. Respondents
+ CRL.M.C. 2513/2009 & Crl. M.A. Nos. 8467/2008 & 8468/2009
GE CAPITAL TRANSPORATION FINANCIAL SERVICES
VERSUS
BHAGWANDAS AUTO FINANCE LTD. & ORS. rhrough: Mr. Nikhil Goel *'il.1T,T;i""t' t.
Crl. M.C. Nos,2462;2467;2474;2497;2512 &2513 of 2009 PageZ
7t
%
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
30.01.2013
Learned counsel for petitioner on instructions from petitioner states that the subject maffer of this petition stands settled between the parties and so, petitioner in afore-captioned petitions do not press these petitions, to which counsel for respondents has no obiection.
In view of above, afore-captioned six petitions are dismissed, as not pressed.
JANUARY 30, 2013 rs
.a
? u
IL GAUR)
Crl' M'C. Nos.2462;2467;2474;2497;2512 &2513 of 2009 Page 3
JUDGMENT