Search Judgments

Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name

Prashant Kumar Parashar v. Sumit Singla & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 20 Mar 2025 · 2025:DHC:1808

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for appointment of arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, holding that the cause of action arose in Bangalore and thus Delhi lacked territorial jurisdiction.

civil petition_dismissed

Faith Constructions v. N.W.G.E.L Church

Delhi High Court · 20 Mar 2025 · 2025:DHC:1806

Delhi High Court dismissed the petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding it lacked territorial jurisdiction as the cause of action and respondent’s business were in Odisha, not Delhi.

civil petition_dismissed

Ravinder Pal Singh v. Registrar Coop. Societies, Delhi & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 20 Mar 2025 · 2025:DHC:1870-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging membership transfer in a cooperative society, holding the petitioner lacked locus standi and elections conducted under court supervision rendered the petition infructuous.

administrative petition_dismissed

Delhi Technological University v. Dr Jai Gopal Sharma

Delhi High Court · 20 Mar 2025

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of appointments made under a special note in a recruitment advertisement, ruling that essential qualifications must be explicitly stated and quashing termination orders based on implied qualification requirements.

administrative appeal_dismissed

Paras Products v. Commissioner Central GST, Delhi North

Delhi High Court · 20 Mar 2025

The Delhi High Court quashed confiscation orders passed after an 11-year delay in adjudication, holding that statutory authorities must conclude proceedings within a reasonable time and directed release of bank guarantees.

tax petition_allowed

MS Shyam Indus Power Solutions Pvt Ltd v. Principal Commissioner CGST Delhi North

Delhi High Court · 20 Mar 2025 · FYs SCC OnLine Del 8756

The Delhi High Court quashed service tax demands and notices due to inordinate delay of 6 to 11 years in adjudication, reaffirming that tax authorities must conclude proceedings within a reasonable time under Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994.

tax petition_allowed

Saurabh Jain v. Mukesh Chand Singhal

Delhi High Court · 20 Mar 2025 · 2025:DHC:1845

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the imposition of costs and striking off defence for delay in filing the written statement, holding that supervisory jurisdiction should not be used to waive legitimate cost orders.

civil petition_dismissed

Kishore Kumar v. Suresh Sethi & Ors.

Delhi High Court · 20 Mar 2025 · 2025:DHC:1844

The High Court dismissed the petition challenging maintainability of an eviction petition under the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that the tenant must avail the statutory remedy of revision against refusal of leave to defend.

property petition_dismissed

Jaya Devi v. Bhupesh Kumar & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 20 Mar 2025 · 2025:DHC:1830

The High Court held that objections under Section 47 CPC are confined to execution issues and dismissed the petition challenging an ex-parte decree as not void or nullity.

civil petition_dismissed

Bhushan Kumar v. Gaurav

Delhi High Court · 20 Mar 2025 · 2025:DHC:1829

The High Court upheld the trial court's discretion to allow belated filing of the written statement upon sufficient cause, dismissing the petition challenging the order.

civil petition_dismissed

Sunehri Bagh Builders Pvt Ltd v. Delhi Tourism and Transportation Development Corporation Ltd

Delhi High Court · 20 Mar 2025 · 2025:DHC:1828

The Delhi High Court held that judicial interference under Article 227 in arbitral proceedings is limited to exceptional cases of perversity and dismissed the petition challenging the Sole Arbitrator's order refusing production of documents at the final arguments stage.

other petition_dismissed

G S C INDUSTRIES v. NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

Delhi High Court · 20 Mar 2025 · 2025:DHC:1849

The Delhi High Court allowed a petition holding that a bona fide cheque dishonour due to bank's technical fault does not disentitle a taxpayer from amnesty scheme benefits or attract penalty and interest.

administrative petition_allowed

M/S RG ASSOCIATES v. M/S P K INDUSTRIES

Delhi High Court · 20 Mar 2025 · 2025:DHC:1840-DB

The High Court of Delhi allowed the appellant's request to withdraw the civil appeal and disposed of the matter accordingly.

civil other

Anita & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 20 Mar 2025 · 2025:DHC:1834-DB

The High Court allowed the petitioners to withdraw their petition with liberty to file appropriate proceedings challenging statutory rules, disposing of the petition as withdrawn.

other other

Meenu Sachdev v. Managing Committee Sri Sathya Sai Vidya Vihar & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 20 Mar 2025 · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 973

The Delhi High Court held that pending disciplinary proceedings do not bar statutory re-employment of a teacher who attains superannuation after November 1 under Rule 110(2) of the Delhi School Education Rules, 1973, and directed reinstatement with benefits.

labor petition_allowed

Saleem v. State (NCT of Delhi)

Delhi High Court · 20 Mar 2025 · 2025:DHC:1858

The Delhi High Court granted furlough to a life convict despite previous absconding on parole, emphasizing the rehabilitative objectives of prison rules and the prisoner's subsequent good conduct.

criminal petition_allowed

Ravi Mohan Sharma v. C.B.I.

Delhi High Court · 20 Mar 2025 · 2025:DHC:1854

The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's order allowing the prosecution to place additional CFSL expert evidence on record and summon an assistant scientific officer as witness after closure of prosecution evidence, holding such action permissible under Sections 91 and 311 Cr.P.C. to ensure a just trial.

criminal petition_dismissed

Kanishk Sharma v. State of NCT of Delhi

Delhi High Court · 20 Mar 2025 · 2025:DHC:1855

The Delhi High Court held that sexual intercourse obtained by false promise of marriage without intent to marry vitiates consent under Section 90 IPC, and refused to quash the FIR alleging rape under Section 376 IPC.

criminal petition_dismissed

M/S HT MEDIA LIMITED v. OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR

Delhi High Court · 20 Mar 2025 · 2025:DHC:1879

The Delhi High Court held that delay in claim processing by the Official Liquidator due to verification of multiple claims does not amount to wilful disobedience or contempt, but directed adherence to timelines.

civil petition_dismissed

Mohd Sajid v. Commissioner of Customs New Delhi

Delhi High Court · 20 Mar 2025 · 2025:DHC:1865-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a show cause notice issued within the six-month period under Section 110 of the Customs Act is valid despite delayed delivery, directing adjudication to proceed with opportunity for reply and provisional release if sought.

administrative petition_dismissed