Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. M/S ALMASS INDIA
The Delhi High Court held that an arbitral award rendered by an arbitrator appointed unilaterally by an ineligible person under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, is without jurisdiction and cannot be enforced.
Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. M/S ALMASS INDIA
The Delhi High Court held that an arbitrator ineligible under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act cannot validly appoint another arbitrator, rendering the arbitral award unenforceable and dismissing MCD's appeal.
Deepak Chaudhary & Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC following a full and final mediated settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties.
Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. M/S ALMASS INDIA
The Delhi High Court held that an arbitrator appointed unilaterally by an ineligible person under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration Act cannot validly render an award, and such award is unenforceable.
Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. M/S ALMASS INDIA
The Delhi High Court upheld the Commercial Court's refusal to enforce an arbitral award rendered by an arbitrator appointed unilaterally by an ineligible person, holding such appointment void and the award unenforceable.
MS. Tayal Agencies v. Kendriya Bhandar
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under the arbitration clause to adjudicate a payment dispute, holding that objections to contract validity and prior arbitration are to be decided by the arbitrator.
Railfab Technologies Pvt Ltd v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate a contract dispute under a valid arbitration clause in the Indian Railways Standard Conditions of Contract.
Nitesh Kumar Singh; Laavanya Kaushik; Aliza Alam; Mohnish Sehrawat v. Ajay Deshwal
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Government's petitions challenging Tribunal orders directing reconsideration of candidates' EWS-based appointments delayed due to COVID-19, affirming prior rulings and mandating compliance.
MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICALS LTD v. THE CONTROLLER OF PATENTS & ANR
The Delhi High Court held that a revocation petition under Section 64 of the Patents Act can be maintained independently of an invalidity defense under Section 107 in an infringement suit absent a counterclaim for revocation, and corrected factual errors in the prior judgment without altering its substantive outcome.
Yash Dev Singh Sejwal v. State & Ors.
The High Court upheld the discharge of Respondent No.2 for lack of maintainability of the complaint but directed further investigation into her alleged prior marriage to ensure a fair trial.
M/s Iconnect India v. Union of India & Ors.
Delhi High Court held that unlocking mobile phones prior to export does not amount to 'taken into use' under Duty Drawback Rules, allowing exporters to claim duty drawback benefits and quashing contrary administrative orders.
Sourabh Bhutani v. Registrar of Cooperative Societies & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the Registrar of Cooperative Societies to recognize the petitioner's membership and forward his name for allotment of a flat, holding that non-availability of original society records cannot defeat a binding arbitration award and prior orders.
Rakesh Kumar Gupta v. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence
The Delhi High Court directed the DRI to copy data from seized electronic devices with integrity safeguards and return the devices to petitioners after verification, establishing procedural safeguards for handling electronic evidence in customs investigations.
D K Sharma v. State of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside the appellant's conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act due to invalid sanction for prosecution and failure to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.
Shashikant v. Bank of Baroda
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's discretion to condone delay in filing the written statement, emphasizing adjudication on merits over procedural technicalities and dismissed the petition under Article 227.
Kamal Raj Bansi v. New Delhi Municipal Council & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed NDMC to consider and decide the petitioner's representation for alternative vending site allocation within two months, affirming protection for recognized street vendors pending eligibility determination.
Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) v. Indian Broadcasting Foundation
The Delhi High Court held that deployment of funds by a charitable institution in shares of a government-mandated not-for-profit entity does not constitute an investment under the Income Tax Act, thereby upholding exemption under Sections 11 and 12.
Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) v. Indian Broadcasting Foundation
The Delhi High Court upheld that funds deployed by a not-for-profit entity pursuant to government directives in a non-profit subsidiary do not constitute an investment violating Income Tax exemption provisions.
Radhey Shyam Garg v. Sangita Poddar
The Delhi High Court recast issues in a suit for recovery of loan and directed the trial court to proceed with evidence in a manner agreed by parties, emphasizing expeditious disposal due to the petitioner's illness.
Sarika Bhagat v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed FIR and related proceedings for non-compliance with the mandatory affidavit requirement under Section 156(3) CrPC, reaffirming Supreme Court precedents to prevent abuse of process.