Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Naveen Juyal and Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 406, 498A, and 34 IPC following an amicable mediation settlement and divorce between the parties, emphasizing the court's power to quash proceedings to promote peace.
Pardeep Garg & Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 406, 498A, and 34 of the BNSS following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties, emphasizing the court's power to promote harmony through compromise in matrimonial disputes.
Sakshi Dhall v. Indira Dhall & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the maintainability of a simpliciter suit for partition by a co-owner presumed in joint possession and held that fixed court fee suffices absent pleaded ouster.
Jasleen Kaur v. Sarvjeet Singh
The High Court upheld the trial court's dismissal of the petitioner's application to reject the plaint in a malicious prosecution suit, holding that the plaint disclosed a cause of action and the suit was within limitation considering the Supreme Court's extension of limitation period during the COVID-19 pandemic.
M/S MKU Ltd v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that at the Section 11 stage, judicial scrutiny is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed an arbitrator to decide disputed issues including limitation and novation.
ANKUSH KUMAR PRAJAPATI v. JAMSHED ALAM & ORS.
The High Court upheld the setting aside of an ex-parte decree in a summary suit, directing the respondents to deposit Rs.15 lacs to contest the suit and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication on merits.
H AND M HENNES AND MAURITZ RETAIL PRIVATE LIMITED v. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 10(1) NEW DELHI & ANR.
The Delhi High Court quashed a reassessment notice issued without mandatory prior approval under Section 151(ii) of the Income Tax Act, affirming that extended limitation under TOLA does not alter the specified authority for approval.
Commissioner of Income Tax (International Tax)-1, New Delhi v. Goto Technologies Ireland Unlimited Company
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's ruling that subscription payments for cloud services by a non-resident are not taxable as royalty income under the India-Ireland DTAA and Income Tax Act.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -7 v. Raja Arora
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's order setting aside an income tax assessment for failure to obtain mandatory prior approval before selecting the return for scrutiny under CBDT Instruction No. 5/2017.
Savitri Devi v. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd
The Delhi High Court modified the deduction for personal expenses from 50% to one-third in a motor accident claim where the bachelor deceased was the sole earning member of a large dependent family, remanding the matter for recalculation of compensation.
National Seeds Corporation Ltd v. Associated Jute Industries
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and refused to condone a 315-day delay in filing under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, holding that protracted settlement negotiations do not constitute sufficient cause for delay.
M/S KLA CONST TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD v. M/S GULSHAN HOMZ PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court held that it has exclusive jurisdiction to appoint an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act where the contract designates Delhi as one of the arbitration seats, emphasizing harmonious construction of arbitration and jurisdiction clauses.
Chishtiya Khuddam Khwaja Sahib Syedzadgan Dargah Sharif, Ajmer v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that an audit under Section 20 of the CAG Act can only proceed after the CAG consents and terms are agreed upon, and the audited body is given a meaningful opportunity to represent against a concrete proposal.
Zorawar Singh; Peechu Singh; Rohan v. Jawaharlal Nehru University & Ors.
The Delhi High Court stayed the termination of a professor by JNU due to procedural irregularities in the sexual harassment inquiry and failure to issue a mandatory show cause notice under the JNU Act.
Bhagwan Sahai Sharma v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 13 -1 Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a reassessment notice issued beyond three years without prior approval under Section 151(ii) of the Income Tax Act is invalid, setting aside the notice and proceedings initiated thereunder.
Nasir v. Ashwani Kumar Wadhwa and Others
The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit for partition and injunctions based on an unregistered Agreement to Sell, holding that such an agreement does not confer ownership or enforceable possession rights under the law.
Staff Selection Commission & Anr. v. Veerendra Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the CAT order due to unexplained delay, emphasizing that inordinate delay and laches bar interference under Article 226.
Staff Selection Commission & Ors. v. Avgalla Meena
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Tribunal's order for a fresh medical examination due to inordinate and unexplained delay, emphasizing that delay and laches bar the exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226.
Harish Kumar v. UOI & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Tribunal’s order denying relaxation of mandatory foot-plate experience for Railway promotion, holding no valid relaxation was granted and the petitioner was rightly de-empaneled.
Ajay Kumar Sharma v. Vivek Bharat Ram & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed an appeal against an interlocutory order recording prima facie views on Trust Deed amendments and audit, holding such orders non-appealable and courts cannot rewrite Trust Deeds in civil suits.