Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Jatin Bhola & Ors. v. The State (N.C.T. of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC on the ground of compromise and mutual settlement between parties in a matrimonial dispute.
Atul Singh and Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act on the ground of compromise and full settlement between parties in a matrimonial dispute.
NXXXX XXXXX v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking directions for further investigation, holding that the Investigating Officer's decision to issue notice instead of arrest was lawful and no interference was warranted.
Hukum Chand @ Monu v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed interim bail sought for medical treatment of piles in a murder case, holding that the ailment was not serious and appropriate treatment was already provided in custody.
Deepak Tyagi v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a dacoity case on the principle of parity with a co-accused, considering his lesser involvement and procedural irregularities in arrest.
Pluto Travels India Private Limited v. PTW Holidays Private Limited
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction restraining defendant from using the deceptively similar mark "PLUTO TOURS" infringing plaintiff's registered trademark "PLUTO" in travel services.
Sushila Devi Mittal & Amit Mittal v. Shikha Garg
The Delhi High Court quashed domestic violence proceedings against the brother-in-law due to lack of specific allegations and held that general claims without material cannot sustain such complaints under the DV Act.
Anique Abdullah v. Mahenoor @ Eirum
The Delhi High Court modified the interim maintenance payable by the husband under the Domestic Violence Act, reducing it to Rs.20,000 per month after considering the parties' income, property, and children's educational expenses.
Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd v. Indorbit Pharmaceuticals P. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that a decree under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC cannot be granted merely due to defendants' default without the plaintiff proving prior adoption and use of the trade dress, and thus refused to pass a decree without trial in a passing off and copyright infringement suit.
Mankind Pharma Limited v. Zhejiang Yige Enterprise Management Group Co. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal of Mankind Pharma, holding that the mark 'FLORASIS' is deceptively similar to the prior registered trademark 'FLORA' and directed removal of 'FLORASIS' from the trademark register.
Romil Gupta Trading as Sohan Lal Gupta v. Registrar of Trade Marks & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside the cancellation of a trademark registration due to the Registrar's failure to give mandatory one month's notice and held that correcting a clerical error without substantial alteration is permissible under the Trade Marks Rules.
Anil Kumar and Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a 2013 FIR under Sections 328, 506, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between parties, emphasizing the Court's power under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 to end criminal proceedings where continuation would be unjust.
Sanjeev Kumar & Ors. v. State of NCT Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a genuine and voluntary settlement between matrimonial parties, emphasizing the role of mediation and abuse of process doctrine.
Abid Ali Siddiqui v. State (Govt of NCT Delhi) and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under section 498A IPC based on a genuine amicable settlement between the parties, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process of law.
Sh. Rakesh Kumar and Ors. v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC following a genuine settlement between estranged spouses, emphasizing the court's power to prevent abuse of process through amicable dispute resolution.
Rajeev Kumar and Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 34, and 406 IPC following a genuine and voluntary amicable settlement between the parties, emphasizing the Court's power to end criminal proceedings in the interest of justice.
Shamikh Shahbaz Shaikh v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail in a serious cyber fraud case, emphasizing the necessity of custodial interrogation and the distinct approach required for economic offences.
Gaurav Jajoria & Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 506, and 34 following a voluntary mutual settlement between the parties, promoting peace and avoiding futile litigation.
Hemant Bhardwaj & Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR based on an amicable settlement between the parties, emphasizing the court's power to prevent futile litigation and promote peace.
Ravi Kumar & Ors. v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 406, 498A, and 34 following an amicable mediation settlement and mutual divorce, emphasizing the court's power to quash proceedings to promote harmony.