Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Praveen Rana v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner’s writ challenging denial of furlough, holding that unapproved punishments are void and minor delayed surrender does not bar furlough under jail standing orders.
Ankit Chhikara & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes on the ground of amicable settlement and compromise between the parties.
Gopal Kapoor and Anr v. State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings arising from matrimonial disputes after the parties amicably settled all issues including custody and financial claims.
Singh Olympics Private Limited v. Commissioner Delhi Goods and Service Tax and Others
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex parte GST adjudication order due to non-communication of the Show Cause Notice and remanded the matter for fresh hearing, while leaving the validity of extension notifications pending before the Supreme Court.
Leela Ram and Others v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed FIR and criminal proceedings under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and withdrawal of prosecution by the complainant.
Kristal Vision Projects Private Limited v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that delivery of a signed arbitral award to an authorized representative via virtual hearing and email constitutes valid delivery under Section 31(5), starting the limitation period for challenge under Section 34.
M/S K HOME APPLIANCES v. M/S MARVS TRAVEL INDIA PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court held that Respondent No. 1 was liable to refund the advance payment to appellant as there was privity of contract and no valid agency shield, allowing the appeal and setting aside the dismissal.
Swapnil Narayan Sarawade & Ors. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that non-university music qualifications like Sangeet Visharad do not satisfy the requirement of a recognised Bachelor's degree for TGT recruitment, and employer's decision on equivalence is not subject to writ court interference absent arbitrariness.
Annu Singh v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking direction for FIR registration under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., holding that ongoing police investigation and chargesheet preclude such direction.
Rajiv Dawar v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to set aside the administrative order transferring all complaints and investigation from EOW to SFIO, holding that the FIR was quashed only against one accused and investigations against others must continue with EOW.
Sagar Gambhir v. The State Govt. of Not of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 498A and 406 IPC based on a genuine amicable settlement between the parties, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Malini Israni v. Ved Prakash Israni
The Delhi High Court directed that evidence in the Family Court case be recorded by the Trial Court itself to ensure expeditious disposal, rejecting the petitioner's claim of improper open recording by a Local Commissioner.
Shri Sunil Pasricha & Anr. v. Shri Shivam Gupta
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's discretionary order allowing the plaintiff to place additional documents on record under Order XI Rule 1(5) CPC, holding that absence of stated reasonable cause at the plaint stage does not warrant interference under Article 227 if no prejudice or perversity is shown.
Vansh Taluja & Anr. v. Bhupinder Kumar Taluja & Ors.
The Delhi High Court passed a preliminary decree partitioning the estate of a deceased among natural heirs, excluding a property proven to be personal, and directed rent sharing and disclosure of movable assets.
Under Armour Inc v. Anish Agarwal & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed Under Armour's appeal, holding that the respondents' use of 'AERO ARMOUR' marks is prima facie deceptively similar to 'UNDER ARMOUR', entitling the appellant to interim relief against trademark infringement.
Amrik Kaur v. Competent Authority New Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking urgent interim relief and directed the petitioner to approach the Appellate Tribunal for restoration and interim relief in an appeal dismissed in default under SAFEMA.
M/S J RAMAN AND COMPANY & ORS. v. M/S RKG POLYMERS
The High Court allowed the petitioners liberty to move a fresh application for expert opinion on disputed signatures after the Trial Court dismissed their earlier application despite prior liberty to refile.
Sher Singh v. The Chairman NDMC
The Delhi High Court held that failure to file a written statement does not mandate judgment for the plaintiff under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC; damages must be proved by evidence and the court has discretion to require proof and allow cross-examination.
Hands On Hands Ventures Private Limited v. Commissioner Delhi Goods and Service Tax and Others
The Delhi High Court set aside a GST demand order passed without proper notice and hearing, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of limitation-extension notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.
Puneet Goyal v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside a non-speaking GST demand order passed without considering the petitioner’s reply and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, leaving open the question of validity of limitation-extension notifications pending Supreme Court decision.