Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
OOZ Media Solutions v. Sales Tax Officer Class II Avato Ward 61 & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside a tax adjudication order passed without personal hearing due to inadequate notice on the GST portal and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, leaving the validity of extension notifications pending before the Supreme Court.
State v. Deepak Garg
The High Court dismissed the State's petition for leave to appeal against the acquittal of a building owner, holding that mere ownership without proof of negligence or direct involvement does not attract criminal liability for building collapse under IPC.
State v. Sharif
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's petition for leave to appeal against acquittal in a rash and negligent driving case due to material discrepancies in eyewitness evidence and lack of prima facie case.
Rizwan Ahmed v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of an accused in a large heroin trafficking case, holding that bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act cannot be granted without reasonable grounds to believe the accused is not guilty when commercial quantity of narcotics is recovered.
Dr. Geetanjali Aggarwal v. Dr. Manoj Aggarwal
The Delhi High Court modified the interim custody order in a guardianship dispute to extend the father's custody period with specific conditions ensuring the child's welfare and restricted visitation rights.
Gopi Chand LRs v. Harijan Sewak Sangh
The court upheld the eviction of the deceased employee's legal representatives, holding that the relationship was a lease despite the 'license fee' nomenclature, affirming the Rent Controller's jurisdiction and binding effect of admissions made by the deceased.
Monu Kumar and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition as withdrawn after the petitioners' grievance was resolved.
Gaurav Joshi & Ors. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 120B IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following a full and final compromise and mutual consent divorce.
MS Kamini Kapoor & Anr. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes upon amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's decision not to pursue prosecution.
Lucky Sharma & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a genuine compromise between the matrimonial parties and the complainant's unwillingness to prosecute.
Suninder Sandha v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Magistrate's order partially allowing document production under Section 91 CrPC, emphasizing necessity and possession criteria, and dismissed petitions challenging the order in a Section 138 NI Act complaint.
Rajender @ Kallu v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s writ seeking emergency parole due to concealment of earlier petitions and false submissions, emphasizing the need for full disclosure and candor in court proceedings.
Vikram Pal v. State GNCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the competent authority to reconsider the petitioner's furlough request treating disputed parole periods correctly under prison rules.
Nishant Pitti v. State of NCT of Delhi & Sonila Mehra
The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs against Nishant Pitti, holding them to be mala fide and an abuse of process arising from business disputes, affirming the High Court's power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash FIRs even after chargesheets are filed.
Rajesh Chopra v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 62(1) Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that a Section 148 notice digitally signed on 31.03.2021 but dispatched on 01.04.2021 is deemed issued on the latter date, validating reassessment proceedings under amended provisions and dismissing the petitioner’s limitation challenge.
AIR CUSTOMS v. Ram Chander
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Customs Department's appeal and upheld the acquittal of a police constable accused of smuggling gold, holding that the prosecution failed to prove recovery and seizure beyond reasonable doubt and that the accused's statement under Section 108 Customs Act required corroboration.
Subhash v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed the summoning order against police officials in a criminal case due to lack of evidence and absence of mandatory sanction under Section 197 Cr.P.C.
Shiv Dutt Bakshi v. Commissioner of Police & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the quashing of FIR registration against a public servant, holding that prior sanction under Section 197 Cr.P.C. and the Prevention of Corruption Act is mandatory before investigation or prosecution.
Selle Royal Group S.P.A. v. ACE Footmark (P) Ltd. and Anr.
The Delhi High Court cancelled the respondent’s trademark FIZIFREAK for being confusingly similar to the petitioner’s prior trademark fi’zi:k, affirming protection of prior user rights and passing off under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Sunaina Rao Kommineni v. Abhiram Balusu
The Delhi High Court dismissed the wife's appeal for guardianship due to lack of territorial jurisdiction and directed the return of the minor child to the husband in Arizona, emphasizing the child's welfare and respecting foreign custody orders.