Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Atul Khanna v. Sushil Kumar & Anr.
The High Court dismissed the second appeal against the possession decree, holding that ownership dispute pending in another suit must be resolved before possession can be decreed.
PICASSO DIGITAL MEDIA PVT LTD v. PICK-A-CENT EDUCATION AND CONSULTANCY SERVICES PVT LTD & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that an application under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act cannot be dismissed on territorial jurisdiction grounds due to prior Section 11(6) proceedings elsewhere, emphasizing the administrative nature of Section 11(6) and directing the trial court to decide the matter on merits.
Shobhana Srivastava v. Manoj Menon
The Delhi High Court dismissed the wife's appeal for enhancement of interim maintenance, holding that maintenance under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act is to enable self-maintenance and litigation, not to equalize financial status.
Masjid Noor Ahmed Wakf & Ors. v. Rafiq Ahmed Thr His Lrs & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 25 of the DRC Act, eviction cannot be executed against persons claiming independent title without adjudication by the Additional Rent Controller, dismissing the petition challenging such adjudication.
Staar Surgical Company v. Care Group India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court vacated the interim injunction against defendants using the trademark IPCL, holding no prima facie case of passing off due to distinct packaging, prior registration, and lack of likelihood of confusion among specialist consumers.
Vijay Kumar v. Delhi Public School & Ors.
The Delhi High Court restored the admission of a minor under the EWS category upon verifying the genuineness of the income certificate and directed a penalty deposit, emphasizing protection of the child's right to education despite alleged parental misconduct.
Abbott Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. v. J.B Remedies Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court decreed a trademark infringement suit based on a joint voluntary settlement under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC, binding the parties to the agreed terms.
Sidharth Choudhary v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash the FIR under Section 376 IPC, holding that specific allegations and jurisdictional facts warranted trial and the FIR could not be quashed at the initial stage.
Ashiq Hussain Faktoo v. Union of India
The Supreme Court dismissed a writ petition challenging a TADA conviction, holding that post-conviction relief under Article 32 is not maintainable except in rare cases involving violation of natural justice or judicial bias.
Gaurav Kumar Tanwar v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail applications as infructuous after quashing the FIR due to settlement and condoned delay in filing amended bail applications.
689facb392ca0e2d48f742ee9445d3f9601287ebcf5feec69a0c650a45ca8453
The Delhi High Court allowed the application to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for approval of a Scheme of Arrangement involving reduction of share capital, as all parties consented in writing.
Nanhe @ Lanka v. State (GNCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 307 IPC based on credible child witness testimony and corroborative forensic and medical evidence, dismissing the appellant’s intoxication defense.
Gaurav Malik & Anr. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal FIR under Sections 324/325/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Anand Pal Singh v. Raj Kumar Saini
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction order under the Delhi Rent Control Act, affirming that bona fide need and landlord status established by receipt of rent justify eviction despite tenant's challenge to ownership.
AWB Krishi Suvidha Parisar (Kota) Private Limited v. AWB India Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Amalgamation between two transferor companies and a transferee company under the Companies Act, 1956, after considering statutory reports and undertakings addressing regulatory concerns.
Clyde Bergemann Beekay India Private Limited v. Clyde Bergemann India Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the amended Scheme of Merger between a wholly owned subsidiary and its holding company under the Companies Act, 1956, allowing dissolution of the transferor company without winding up.
M/S STELLAR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LTD v. MR RAKESH KUMAR & ORS
The Delhi High Court held that post-termination non-compete clauses restraining employees from carrying on business are void under Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act, and injunctions cannot be granted to restrain use of publicly available client information.
Paras Ram & Anr. v. Rajinder Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an Executing Court cannot go beyond the decree in restitution proceedings and allowed appellants to retain possession of construction made after the decree pending abatement proceedings, subject to equitable conditions.
Tribhuvan Enterprises & Anr v. Thakar Petrochemicals Ltd. & Anr
Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that privity of contract existed between parties and Delhi courts had jurisdiction, thereby upholding the trial court's decree for recovery against appellants.
Krishan Manchanda v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court’s appointment of a guardian/next friend for a mentally challenged probate respondent, dismissing the petitioner’s challenge based on procedural compliance and lack of bona fide.