Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Vijay Kumar & Ors. v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable FIR under Sections 498-A and 307 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Narinder Kumar Sikka v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The High Court upheld the framing of charges against the petitioner for using a forged invitation letter to obtain a visa, holding that sufficient prima facie material existed at the charge framing stage.
Ashok Kumar Bind v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's refusal to recall prosecution witnesses for further cross-examination, holding that once witnesses are examined, cross-examined, and discharged, they cannot be recalled merely due to ineffective earlier cross-examination or change of counsel.
Yogesh Kumar & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 498-A IPC based on an amicable settlement, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Ashwani Kumar Sharma v. State (GNCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of a husband charged with murder of his wife, holding that parity with co-accused does not guarantee bail and serious offences require careful scrutiny before granting bail.
Inderjeet @ Poppy v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of Inderjeet @ Poppy in a murder case, holding that the prima facie evidence and risk of witness tampering justified denial of bail.
Harbhajan Singh v. State
Bail was rightly refused to an accused charged with murder who was declared a proclaimed offender and absconded, with the court holding that parity with co-accused granted bail is not an absolute ground for release.
Ravi Kant Prabhakar v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi
Bail was denied to the petitioner accused of cheating and forgery involving fraudulent discount coupons due to pending investigation, non-arrest of co-accused, and risk of tampering with evidence.
MakeMyTrip (India) Pvt Ltd v. Union of India; IBIBO Group Pvt Ltd v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that DGCEI cannot arrest officials or take coercive action without issuing a show cause notice under the Finance Act, and that online travel agents are liable to pay service tax only on their commission, not on gross hotel booking amounts.
M/S MANGLAYATAM PROJECTS PVT LTD v. DHARAM VEER SINGH THR LRS & ANR
The Delhi High Court granted specific performance of a sale agreement for agricultural land, directing the defendants to execute the sale deed upon payment of the balance consideration and obtaining necessary statutory clearances.
Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Medi Pharma & Another
The Delhi High Court granted a permanent injunction restraining defendants from using the trademark "POLYCAP" for pharmaceutical products, holding it infringed the plaintiff's registered mark and goodwill.
Paramjit Kaur & Ors. v. Teja Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a restrictive clause in a Will prohibiting alienation of property for 10 years post-death, declared a relinquishment deed violating this clause void, and restored the trial court's decree in favor of the appellants.
Amtul Habib v. Maujma Khan
The Delhi High Court set aside the order granting leave to defend in an eviction petition under the DRC Act, affirming the landlord's bona fide requirement and ownership, and passed an eviction order against the tenant.
eBIZ.COM PVT. LTD. v. Union of India & Ors.
Delhi High Court held that DGCEI's search, summons, and arrest of eBIZ's MD without prior show cause notice or adherence to statutory procedure under the Finance Act, 1994 were illegal and quashed the actions.
Sachin Taneja & Ors. v. Yatinderjit Singh
The Delhi High Court allowed condonation of delay in filing the list of witnesses beyond the 30-day limit under Section 148 CPC, emphasizing the court's inherent power to extend time for ends of justice and permitted the petitioner to call additional witnesses subject to costs.
Monika Arora v. Neeraj Kohli & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that a suit relating to an agreement for sale of property notified as commercial and intended for exclusive commercial use is a commercial dispute under the Commercial Courts Act and must be adjudicated by the Commercial Division of the High Court.
Amtul Habib v. Maujma Khan
The Delhi High Court quashed the ARC's order granting leave to defend in an eviction petition under the DRC Act and allowed eviction with a six-month stay on execution.
Samaj Parivartana Samudaya v. State of Karnataka
The Supreme Court upheld NMDC's right to adopt differential pricing for iron ore based on market conditions and dismissed the petition seeking uniform pricing and export permissions without general norms.
Cardamom Marketing Corporation & Anr. v. State of Kerala & Ors.
The Supreme Court upheld the validity of an additional court fee levied under the Kerala Court Fees Act to fund legal services and social security for advocates, rejecting the challenge that it was an impermissible tax without quid pro quo.
Sangli Aluminium Extrusions Pvt Ltd v. Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Ltd
The Bombay High Court held that a purchaser under SARFAESI Act without notice of sales tax dues is not liable for such dues and MIDC cannot demand increased Differential Premium beyond rates prevailing at transfer application.