Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Sugam Exim Private Limited v. Atlas Constructions Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Arrangement amalgamating four transferor companies into a transferee company under the Companies Act, 1956, after ensuring compliance with statutory and regulatory requirements including RBI norms.
Puriflair India Private Limited v. Delair India Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between Puriflair India Private Limited and Delair India Private Limited under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, dissolving the transferor company without winding up.
Lalit Kumar v. The State (Through Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279 and 304-A IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Vishal Thakur & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 498-A IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Mahesh Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable theft FIR under Section 380 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Shanti Devi & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act based on an amicable settlement between parties in a matrimonial dispute, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Gaurav Karn v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and condonation application, holding that the appellant failed to show sufficient cause for the inordinate delay in filing the claim petition and appeal, thereby upholding the dismissal of the claim as time barred.
Punjab National Bank v. BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a supplementary electricity bill raised within two years of discovering a bona fide mistake in the Current Transformer Ratio, holding that the Electricity Act, 2003 overrides earlier regulatory limitations on recovery.
Shri Kishan Chand Dass & Ors v. Kuoni Travel (India) Private Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that tenancy rights prevent delivery of possession in partition suits unless terminated, and omissions to direct possession in such cases are not accidental errors correctable under CPC.
Federation of Nehru Place Association & Ors. v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court held that Nehru Place is not a formally declared no hawking zone and directed regulatory authorities to balance street vendors' rights with property owners' interests under the Street Vendors Act, dismissing the petition seeking removal of vendors.
M/S DELHI OUTDOOR ADVERTISERS ASSOCIATION v. SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of the 2007 Outdoor Advertisement Policy implemented under Supreme Court directions, dismissing the petitioner's challenge based on statutory non-compliance and fundamental rights violations.
Dr S S Srivastava v. Satya Pal Nanda & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order allowing amendment of pleadings to include omitted facts, holding that such amendments do not change the cause of action and are permissible in the interest of justice.
T.S.R. Prasada Rao v. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing CSIR to grant pension benefits to the petitioner by counting his past PSU service, holding that failure to exercise option for CPF scheme within stipulated time results in deemed opting for pension scheme.
Yogesh Sharma v. Raj Bala & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of the petitioner's application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that a suit for declaration and possession based on title and possession is not barred by limitation and cannot be summarily dismissed on disputed facts.
Jyoti & Ors. v. Yogesh Aggarwal
The Delhi High Court upheld denial of compensation under the Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923 based on an admissible FSL report showing the deceased was under the influence of liquor at the time of the fatal accident.
STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE v. R. SOBHANA
The Supreme Court held that the Bank lawfully acquired absolute ownership of the mortgaged property after auction sale but granted ex-gratia relief to the distressed borrowers despite no legal entitlement.
National Building Construction Corporation Ltd v. Khosmendir Singh Gahunia
The Supreme Court permitted temporary closure of a public road for redevelopment with restoration undertakings and remitted the matter for judicial safeguards, emphasizing compliance with sanctioned layout plans.
Hindustan Lever Ltd. v. State of Karnataka
The Supreme Court held that packing materials used in tea manufacturing are distinct from raw materials or inputs and are not exempt from entry tax under the Karnataka Tax on Entry of Goods Act, 1979.
The Management of TNSTC (Coimbatore) Ltd. v. M. Chandrasekaran
The Supreme Court held that the approval authority under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act must not reappreciate evidence but consider if a prima facie case exists, applying res ipsa loquitur to uphold dismissal for rash driving causing fatal accident.
Saroj Maheshwari v. State of Haryana & Ors.
The Supreme Court remanded a land possession dispute to the High Court for fresh consideration due to unresolved conflicting claims on the timeline of possession.