Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Mahender Singh Dhillon v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of writ petitions with liberty to challenge the respondents' order dated 27.06.2016 through appropriate legal remedies.
Om Prakash & Anr v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 420, 471, and 120-B IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, affirming the High Court's inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash non-compoundable offences to secure ends of justice and prevent abuse of process.
M/S Appreciate Fincapp Pvt Ltd v. HKK Buildwell Pvt Ltd
The court directed transfer of money recovery decrees to the court having jurisdiction over the attached immovable property and allowed continuation of the attachment order pending execution.
Pratap Singh and Anr. v. Mahavir Singh and Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed partial amendment of plaint under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC after trial commencement to add reliefs of cancellation, possession, and mesne profits, while disallowing new facts that would substitute the plaint, clarifying the scope of amendments and limitation.
Padamjit Singh v. New Delhi Municipal Council
The Delhi High Court held that NDMC's removal of the petitioner's weighing machine and electricity disconnection without prior notice violated natural justice and directed reinstatement with due process.
Babu Lal Mitharwal v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider and decide the petitioner’s representation for pay scale revision by a reasoned order within three months, without granting substantive relief on pay parity claims.
Ishwar Chand Jindal v. Shashi Prabha Jindal
The Delhi High Court upheld a Family Court's order granting Rs. 2 lakhs per month pendente lite maintenance to the wife, emphasizing consideration of income, status, and reasonable needs under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act.
V.K. Sood Engineers and Contractors v. Northern Railways
The Delhi High Court held that payments due to a partnership firm cannot be withheld on account of recovery claims against a separate proprietorship firm with a similar name, directing release of admitted payments pending arbitration.
NATRIP IMPLEMENTATION SOCIETY v. IVRCL LIMITED
The Delhi High Court held that financial distress alone does not justify an order to secure amounts claimed in arbitration and upheld the arbitral tribunal's discretion to deny such interim relief absent evidence of asset dissipation.
Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd v. Karambir Tyagi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld compensation including future prospects for the deceased but set aside penal interest imposed after appeal filing, partially allowing the insurer's appeal.
Union of India v. Ravindranath Narendranath Padukone
The Delhi High Court granted a limited extension of time with costs to complete a departmental enquiry against a retired officer, clarifying that appointment of a fresh Inquiry Officer does not necessarily mean a de novo enquiry.
Deepak Mohan v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition challenging a transfer order, directing the respondents to provide service documents and deeming the 'No Demand Certificate' granted, while protecting the petitioner from liability for missing inventory items.
South Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Satish Builders
The Delhi High Court held that the limitation period for re-filing arbitration objections runs from the date of return by the Registry, condoned delay caused by administrative processes, and set aside the trial court's dismissal of objections as time barred.
Verizon Trademark Services LLC & Ors. v. Bhabani Sankar Swain & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted a permanent injunction against defendants using the mark 'VERIZON' or deceptively similar marks, holding it to be trademark infringement and passing off, while declining damages for lack of proof.
M/S APOLLO TYRES LTD v. M/S INDIRA TYRES
The High Court convicted the accused for dishonour of 61 cheques under Section 138 NI Act, holding that admission of debt in statutory notice reply precludes defence of security deposit without documentary proof.
M/S APOLLO TYRES LTD v. M/S INDIRA TYRES
The Delhi High Court set aside the trial court's acquittal and convicted the accused under Section 138 NI Act, holding that the cheques were issued for discharge of admitted debt and the defence of security deposit was unsubstantiated.
M/S APOLLO TYRES LTD v. M/S INDIRA TYRES
The Delhi High Court set aside the Trial Court's acquittal and convicted the accused for dishonour of 61 cheques under Section 138 NI Act, holding that their unsubstantiated claim of security deposit failed to rebut the statutory presumption of debt.
M/S APOLLO TYRES LTD v. M/S INDIRA TYRES
The High Court convicted the respondents under Section 138 NI Act, holding that admission of debt and issuance of cheques in reply to statutory notice establishes liability, and unsubstantiated security deposit claims do not discharge it.
M/S APOLLO TYRES LTD v. M/S INDIRA TYRES
The Delhi High Court set aside the acquittal and convicted the accused under Section 138 NI Act, holding that admission of debt and issuance of cheques creates a presumption of liability which cannot be rebutted by unsubstantiated claims of security deposit.
M/S APOLLO TYRES LTD v. M/S INDIRA TYRES
The High Court set aside the acquittal and convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, holding that admission of debt in reply to statutory notice establishes liability despite unsubstantiated claims of security deposit.