Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
M/S ABASKAR CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. v. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL
The Delhi High Court directed NDMC to hear the petitioner’s representation before enforcing disputed electricity charges under Section 126 of the Electricity Act, 2003, emphasizing the right to a hearing prior to recovery.
Sharma Farms Private Limited v. Globus Projects Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between Sharma Farms Pvt. Ltd. and Globus Projects Pvt. Ltd. under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, after satisfying itself of approvals and statutory compliance.
Paramjeet Singh v. Delhi Development Authority
The High Court dismissed the petition challenging refusal to amend the plaint after trial commencement, holding that late amendments changing the suit's nature without due diligence are impermissible.
Asheesh Vaderaa v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a party supporting the petitioner in a probate suit has the right to cross-examine an objector's witness if allegations are made against that party, ensuring the fundamental right to test evidence under Section 138 of the Indian Evidence Act.
38c94626fbb0ac68a704643771046a6bfccd83063ea4b5ff9a1078cde54f4a2b
The court dismissed petitions seeking stay of possession order already implemented and directed expeditious disposal of the related appeal by the Deputy Commissioner.
MVL Ltd & Anr v. Ankush Gandhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court disposed of the appeal on the basis of a settlement with payment of decretal amount and interest, and granted refund of court fees under Section 16A of the Court Fee Act.
Brij Trading Company Private Limited v. Hindustan Unilever Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn after the parties reached a full and final settlement through mediation and the appellant received the agreed payment.
Virender Singh Rawat v. Rakesh Kumar Gupta
The Supreme Court held that supplementary statements and contemporaneous evidence can establish a prima facie case for framing charges even if the accused was not named in the initial FIR, setting aside the High Court's order and directing trial to proceed.
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI THR. SECRETARY LAND AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT AND ANR v. M/S USHA DYE CASTINGS PVT. LTD. & ORS
The Supreme Court dismissed the Government of NCT of Delhi's appeal against land acquisition proceedings, granting a one-year window to initiate fresh acquisition under the 2013 Act, failing which possession must revert to original owners.
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI v. KAILASH CHAND GUPTA
The Supreme Court upheld the lapse of land acquisition proceedings under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act and allowed the government liberty to initiate fresh proceedings within one year.
M/S. SURYACHAKRA POWER CORPORATION LIMITED v. ELECTRICITY DEPARTMENT, PORT BLAIR
The Supreme Court held that delay beyond 120 days in filing an appeal under Section 125 of the Electricity Act, 2003 cannot be condoned, and principles of due diligence and good faith under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 must be satisfied to exclude delay.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. KAILASH CHAND GUPTA
The Supreme Court dismissed Delhi Development Authority's appeals but allowed one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Act, failing which possession must be returned to original owners.
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI v. MAHENDER SINGH
The Supreme Court held that lapse of land acquisition proceedings under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act applies only to lands with an award where possession or compensation was not completed, and stay orders on some lands cannot extend to all lands under the same notification.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. PRAMA BHANDARI
The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal, directing it to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings within one year or return possession to original landowners, without affecting pending civil suits.
THE ELECTRICITY DEPARTMENT, SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, PORT BLAIR AND ANR v. M/S SURYACHAKRA POWER CORPORATION LIMITED
The Supreme Court upheld the project cost determined by expert committees accepted by the administration but set aside the Appellate Tribunal's suo moto allowance of additional costs for delay not pleaded in the appeal.
Scrum Alliance, Inc v. Mr. Prem Kumar S. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the defendants infringed the plaintiff's registered Certification Trade Marks "CERTIFIED SCRUMMASTER" and "CSM" by unauthorized use of identical and deceptively similar marks and logos, granting injunction against the defendants.
Mahavir Lamba v. State & Anr
Delhi High Court allowed revision petitions and acquitted the petitioner by compounding the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act following a settlement between the parties.
Amrit Lal Shukla v. Harish Kumar
The Delhi High Court quashed the ARC's order granting leave to contest eviction for lack of reasons and improper application of law, remanding the matter for fresh consideration.
Indian Defence Service of Engineers Association v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of the 1989 Military Engineer Services Regulations and 1991 IDSE Rules, affirming the composite military-civilian character of MES and rejecting challenges based on procedural and constitutional grounds.
Siddharth International Public School v. Motor Accident Claim Tribunal & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the direction to admit a differently-abled accident victim child under the EWS category in a private school, affirming the broad constitutional jurisdiction to enforce rights under the RTE Act despite procedural and jurisdictional objections.