Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Amritpal Singh & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties, reaffirming the Court's inherent jurisdiction to prevent abuse of process of law.
Sagar Rajendra Kumar Mangla v. Union of India & Ors.
Delhi High Court grants a 7-month extension of license for operation of a railway catering stall accounting for Covid-19 closure period, affirming its jurisdiction and following precedents.
Conqueror Innovations Private Limited & Anr. v. Xiaomi Technology India Private Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiffs' interim injunction applications, holding that the defendant's 'Find Device' feature does not infringe the essential elements of the plaintiffs' registered patent and noting non-working and delay as additional factors.
Govt of NCT of Delhi v. Saroj Nagar
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's order granting ex post facto approval of study leave to a government employee where the competent authority unduly delayed sanction despite timely application.
Rehan Ahmed Khan v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and remanded the writ petition for fresh consideration of the applicability of a 2020 Office Memorandum on pension benefits for service prior to 2004.
Mangal Deep v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside a GST demand order passed without proper notice, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of related notifications to the Supreme Court.
Mangal Deep v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST demand order for lack of opportunity to be heard and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication pending Supreme Court's decision on the validity of extension notifications.
Pramod Kumar Yadav v. Union of India and Ors
The petitioner withdrew the writ petition after receiving promotion, leading to its disposal by the High Court.
Ex Inspector Sanjay Kumar v. Sh. Ajay K. Bhalla and Ors.
Contempt petition dismissed as respondents complied with court order on retiral benefits; entitlement to interest is a separate issue to be pursued via writ petition.
Lt Col R Sanjay v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court permitted withdrawal of a writ petition by Lt. Col R Sanjay, allowing him to pursue the matter before the Armed Forces Tribunal.
Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Rohit Goel
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's quashing of disciplinary penalty imposed without supplying the Inquiry Report or hearing, emphasizing strict adherence to natural justice in disciplinary proceedings.
Delhi Factory Owners' Federation v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the Municipal Corporation of Delhi has jurisdiction to levy conversion charges in industrial areas under the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act and Master Plan for Delhi, 2021, and that the DIDOMA Act does not confer exclusive authority on DSIIDC to collect such charges.
State v. Yogesh @ Golu & Anr.
The Delhi High Court condoned a 325-day delay in filing a State revision petition challenging discharge in a serious offence case, emphasizing a liberal approach balanced with the need to prevent systemic delays.
Kiran Pal Singh Bajwa v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of an accused charged with sexual assault obtained by false promise of marriage and impersonation of a police officer, holding that prima facie material negated consent and bail was not warranted.
Ajay Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for robbery but granted him the benefit of probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, modifying the sentence despite the mandatory minimum under Section 397 IPC.
Amit Jain & Ors. v. Anila Jain & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed Plaintiffs' suit for declaration of title based on unregistered customary documents, holding that such documents do not confer ownership and the suit is barred by limitation and law.
Pacifica Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. Township Project Buyers Association
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the NCDRC order permitting the respondent access to documents and time to file a reply, holding that there was no illegality warranting interference under Article 227.
Sushil Kumari v. Sanjay Saxena
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner’s request to file a delayed site plan due to e-filing technical issues, directing strict compliance with timelines henceforth.
M/S Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt Ltd v. Rajesh Kumar Patwari
The High Court directed the petitioner to deposit the decretal amount before the State Commission and kept the attachment warrants in abeyance pending compliance.
Union of India & Ors. v. Dilip Kumar Chaturvedi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for lack of jurisdiction, directing the petitioner to approach the Chhattisgarh High Court as per the Supreme Court's territorial jurisdiction principle in consumer dispute matters.