Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Lalit Kumar @ Nandi v. State (GNCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the accused in a serious assault case, emphasizing his cooperation with investigation and absence of flight risk, subject to conditions.
Kailash Devi v. Tej Pal and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to prioritize and expeditiously dispose of a 30-year-old civil suit filed by an elderly plaintiff seeking possession and damages.
Twinkle Vinayak v. Vishal Verma
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking direction to expedite a pending divorce proceeding, holding that no time-bound disposal can be directed without compelling hardship and heavy pendency justifies no interference.
Surya Prakash v. Krishna Gaur
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the refusal to set aside an ex-parte decree, holding that summons served via WhatsApp and newspaper publication constitute valid service under Order IX Rule 13 CPC.
Gurvinder Singh v. Praveen Nagpal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's refusal to consolidate four civil suits due to differing parties and issues but directed coordinated hearing to avoid conflicting judgments.
Rakesh Singh & Ors. v. Sushil Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking injunction against landlords and MCD, upholding expert findings that the building was unsafe and affirming the necessity of statutory eviction procedures for repairs.
Sahin Begum v. Shabnam & Ors.
The High Court held that an order on an injunction application is appealable and directed the petitioner to approach the trial court to address alleged violations of the undertaking regarding construction under the guise of necessary repairs.
Anil Kumar Gupta & Anr. v. Geeta & Anr.
The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Trial Court's suo moto order fixing the matter for maintainability hearing, holding no compelling reason to interfere at this stage.
M/S. SHREE KARANGAR TEXTILES PRIVATE LIMITED v. SACHIN ARORA
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the trial court's refusal to admit additional documents at final arguments, emphasizing limited interference under Article 227 and the need for expeditious disposal of commercial suits.
Union of India and Ors. v. Radm Rajesh Singh (Retd.)
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that disability arising post-entry is service-related unless rebutted by the employer.
M/S PACIFIC HOSPITALITY v. M/S MASSIVE RESTAURANTS PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against an interim injunction restraining use of the 'Farzi Cafe' brand, clarifying that other reliefs must await arbitration and declining to decide on the arbitration agreement's existence.
Shubham Malik v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed CISF to medically re-examine a candidate for fitness after six months post-hernia surgery and to consider his appointment against unfilled EWS vacancies if found fit.
Laxmi Chauhan v. Commissioner of Customs Airport and General
The Delhi High Court held that personal jewellery detained by Customs without issuance of Show Cause Notice and personal hearing must be released upon payment of redemption fine and penalty, affirming procedural safeguards under the Customs Act and Baggage Rules.
Qamar Jahan v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed release of detained personal jewellery pending amendment of Baggage Rules, mandated compliance with Court orders on storage charges, and approved interim SOPs to regulate Customs detention procedures.
Novo Nordisk AS v. Dr. Reddys Laboratories Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed expedited hearing of interim relief in a patent infringement suit, emphasizing the need to address export infringement issues without undue deferral.
Ram Chander v. Delhi Disaster Management Authority and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that termination of a contractual employee without issuing a show cause notice or providing an opportunity of hearing violates natural justice and set aside the termination order.
Abhishek Aggarwal v. Indrawati and Ors
The High Court held that an interim order dismissing an application to recall witnesses is not amenable to revision under Section 115 CPC, and dismissed the petition accordingly.
Raj Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction for armed robbery under Sections 392/397 IPC but reduced the fine and default sentence considering the appellant's conduct and time served.
Paras Parjapat v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction under Section 307 IPC but modified the sentence by enhancing the fine and ordering release on the period already undergone.
R K Tiwari @ R K Tripathi v. Naveen Capoor
The Delhi High Court held that an interim order denying further cross-examination is not amenable to revision under Section 115 CPC as it does not finally dispose of the suit or proceeding.