Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Shashi Bala Jain v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court remanded the reassessment notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act for fresh consideration by the Assessing Officer after hearing the petitioner, emphasizing compliance with limitation and judicial precedents.
Tejinder Singh v. Beverley Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's injunction restraining alienation of the shared matrimonial property during pending maintenance proceedings, affirming Family Court jurisdiction and protective relief in matrimonial disputes.
Sunil Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court set aside a cryptic Tribunal order dismissing recruitment-related claims and remanded the matter for fresh, reasoned consideration.
Swadeshi Tubes Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 22(2), New Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed remand of disputed income tax notices and orders to the Assessing Officer for fresh hearing and decision within four weeks, emphasizing compliance with statutory and constitutional requirements.
Union of India and Anr. v. Manoj Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld Tribunal orders setting aside termination of employees for alleged impersonation during recruitment, holding that such stigmatic termination requires departmental inquiry and cannot be based solely on an unproved FSL report.
Sachin Yadav v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition seeking compassionate appointment filed long after the death of the government servant, reaffirming that such appointments must be sought promptly and are not a right or alternative recruitment mode.
Monika Juneja v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
The High Court declined to interfere under its supervisory jurisdiction where the substantive injunction application was pending before the Trial Court and the appellate court had permitted fresh arguments.
Rajesh Kumar & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the respondents to treat it as a representation and decide on the issues within six weeks.
Ritu Sharma v. Kailash Chand and Anr
The High Court upheld the execution of a possession decree against a judgment debtor, holding that a purchaser of the property during the pendency of the suit cannot resist execution under the doctrine of lis pendens.
Brigadier Balwant Dahiya Trust v. Shakuntala Dahiya and Ors
The High Court granted defendant no. 5 one final opportunity to produce a witness despite earlier closure by the Trial Court due to non-service of summons.
Casablanca Apparels Pvt Ltd v. Polo/ Lauren Company L.P.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the condonation of delay application and consequently the commercial appeal filed beyond the prescribed limitation period, holding that the appellant failed to demonstrate sufficient cause under the Limitation Act, 1963 and Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
Sansadiya Adhikari Welfare Society v. Utpal Kumar Tripathi & Ors.
A welfare society acquiring land for residential development for members qualifies as a promoter under RERA and must comply with its provisions including pre-deposit requirements.
Sonu S/O Shri Ben Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for sexual offences against a child under IPC and POCSO Act, affirming the reliability of the child victim's testimony and rejecting the appeal despite minor discrepancies in timelines.
Vipin Gupta v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that a compromise with legal representatives of a deceased victim cannot be a ground to quash an FIR under Sections 279/304A IPC, rejecting the petition and allowing criminal proceedings to continue.
Rihan Khan @Dulare v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of an accused charged with abetment to suicide and dowry harassment, relying on the suicide note and supportive testimony of the deceased's parents.
Deepak Mishra v. The NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a serious harassment and sexual offence case, emphasizing the right to speedy trial, delay in FIR registration, contradictions in prosecution evidence, and absence of risk of tampering.
Qamar Ikbal v. State (GNCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of an accused alleged to have facilitated a large-scale cyber cheating racket by providing bank accounts, holding that custodial detention was necessary at the investigation's initial stage.
Vikas Kumar Singh v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the lawful towing and seizure of a vehicle parked in a public place under the 2024 Delhi Guidelines and directed its release upon compliance with prescribed procedures.
Seema Rani & Ors. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed temporary de-sealing of petitioners' shops to enable rectification of unauthorized constructions, with subsequent inspection and consideration for permanent de-sealing by the MCD.
Ravi v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Tribunal's order directing a Review DPC to be conducted as per rules, holding no grievance arose from the Tribunal's disposal without impleading the petitioner.