Mannu Kaushik & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 25 Jul 2025
Girish Kathpalia
CRL.M.C. 4215/2025 & 4216/2025
criminal petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court quashed cross FIRs arising from a group assault after parties compromised, subject to payment of costs, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

Full Text
Translation output
CRL.M.C. 4215/2025 & 4216/2025
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 25.07.2025
CRL.M.C. 4215/2025
MANNU KAUSHIK & ORS. .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Akshay Mahajan, Advocate
VERSUS
TEH STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents
Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for the State Mr. Narendra Singh, Advocate for
R-2
CRL.M.C. 4216/2025
MOHAN LAL GAUR & ORS. .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Narendra Singh, Advocate
VERSUS
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents
Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for the State
Mr. Akshay Mahajan, Advocate for R-2
CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
JUDGMENT
(ORAL)

1. Petitioners seek quashing of cross FIRs No. 451/2017 of Police Station Keshav Puram, New Delhi for offence under Section 323/341/452/506/34 IPC and FIR No. 452/2017 of Police Station Keshav Puram, New Delhi for offence under Section 308/324/341/34 IPC.

2. The quashing is sought on the ground that parties have compromised the disputes with each other. Statements of parties were recorded by the GIRISH KATHPALIA KATHPALIA Date: 2025.07.25 17:49:36 +05'30' CRL.M.C. 4215/2025 & 4216/2025 pages concerned Joint Registrar.

3. Broadly speaking, on the issue of taking over Navyuvak Brahmin Samaj, two groups assaulted each other, causing multiple injuries to each other. In the alleged incident, one of them also lost consciousness and was taken to hospital. Both groups, in the incident threatened to kill each other.

4. Learned APP submits that State has no objection to these petitions keeping in mind permanent quietus as the petitioners are residents of same area.

5. I have examined both FIRs as well as MLCs of injured persons.

6. Considering the overall circumstances mentioned above, both these petitions are allowed and the cross FIRs No. 451/2017 of Police Station Keshav Puram, New Delhi for offence under Section 323/341/452/506/34 IPC and FIR No. 452/2017 of Police Station Keshav Puram, New Delhi for offence under Section 308/324/341/34 IPC and proceedings arising therefrom are quashed subject to each of the petitioners depositing costs of Rs. 10,000/- with DHCLSC within one week. It is made clear that if the cost is not deposited within one week, the proceedings arising out of these FIRs shall continue in accordance with law. (JUDGE) JULY 25, 2025 ‘rs’