Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Paul Deepak Rajaratnam & Ors. v. Surgeport Logistics Private Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld an interim arbitral award enforcing non-compete obligations under a subsisting shareholders' agreement, dismissing the appellants' challenge to its validity and termination.
Pankaj Jain v. Parul Jain
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's dismissal of injunction applications under Section 22 of the Hindu Marriage Act, ruling that references to matrimonial proceedings in bona fide legal defence do not constitute prohibited publication.
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. v. BAPUNA ALCOBREW PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court upheld the refund of excise duty and import permit fee paid without actual import of liquor, affirming the doctrine of unjust enrichment and maintainability of writ petitions for such refund claims.
Devender Kumar v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail to a police constable accused of corruption, emphasizing the extraordinary nature of anticipatory bail and the need for absolute intolerance towards corruption by public servants.
Vedanta Limited v. Gujarat State Petroleum Corporation Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that an arbitration agreement existed prima facie between Vedanta and Gujarat State Petroleum Corporation based on bid acceptance and conduct, and appointed the respondent's arbitrator to proceed with arbitration.
Sher Singh Rawat v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s bail application in a murder case, holding that prima facie evidence including eyewitness and electronic evidence justified denial of bail once trial had commenced.
Jarnail Singh v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to a petitioner accused of providing forged documents for a U.S. VISA application, holding that absence of prima facie evidence and cooperation with investigation justified bail.
Deepak Kumar Gupta v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a cheating and forgery case after considering the prolonged custody, stage of trial, and absence of risk of tampering with evidence or witnesses.
Sunil Kumar & Anr. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC based on an amicable settlement and divorce between the parties, applying the principle that continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process of law.
Ferrero SPA & Ors. v. M.B. Enterprises
The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment in favor of Ferrero SPA, permanently restraining the defendant from selling counterfeit 'NUTELLA' products, declared 'NUTELLA' a well-known trademark, and awarded damages and costs for trademark infringement and passing off.
Waterways Leisure Tourism Private Limited v. Mukesh Prasad Thapliyal and Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction restraining defendants from using deceptively similar marks incorporating "Cordelia" in the hospitality sector, affirming the plaintiff's exclusive rights under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
State of NCT of Delhi v. Vinod Bhardwaj
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused for serious charges due to lack of evidence and maintained the conviction with fine for lesser offences, dismissing the State's appeal for enhancement.
Sanjay Kumar Jain v. State (Through A.C.B)
The Delhi High Court acquitted three MCD officials of corruption and cheating charges due to lack of cogent evidence proving conspiracy, loss, or corrupt intent, emphasizing the necessity of valid sanction and reliable proof in public servant prosecution.
Union of India & Ors. v. CDR Maha Ram Yadav
The High Court of Delhi allowed the Union of India to withdraw writ petition W.P.(C) 10895/2025 and disposed of it accordingly.
Nnamdi Ezen eche v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to foreign nationals accused of violence in a detention centre, directing their release on personal bond with conditions and ordered inquiry into withheld CCTV evidence.
Mohd Tazeem v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging a procedural order directing utility authorities to inform the court about disconnection of electricity and water supply at a property involved in unauthorized construction, holding that the petitioner lacked locus standi to challenge such an order.
Yesak Angsom Gebrreegizagaber v. Narcotics Control Bureau
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in an NDPS case due to lack of direct evidence connecting him to the drug seizure, relying primarily on insufficient CCTV footage and recovery of cash.
Subhan v. State (GNCT) of Delhi; Masoom v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of appellants for armed robbery and assault based on credible eyewitness identification, recovery of stolen goods, and medical evidence, dismissing their appeal despite minor inconsistencies and absence of fingerprint matches.
Kiran Pathak v. Phire Ram and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that compensation for land acquired for a wildlife sanctuary should be enhanced annually at a cumulative rate of 12%, dismissing the Union of India's appeal and allowing respondents' cross objections.
Pradip Kumar Singh v. All India Council for Technical Education
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of a candidate's recruitment application for failure to submit the required experience certificate in the prescribed format by the closing date, emphasizing strict adherence to eligibility criteria and procedural requirements.