Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
SRSC Infra Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court quashed the uncommunicated and unreasoned debarment order and consequent withdrawal of the contract award, emphasizing the necessity of natural justice and reasoned decisions in public procurement debarments.
Ravinder @ Kalu v. The State NCT of Delhi; Raghunath @ Chhotu v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court deferred final decision on sexual offence convictions pending further evidence to conclusively determine the prosecutrix's age, emphasizing strict compliance with juvenile justice provisions for proving minority.
TPF Engineering Pvt Ltd v. National Highways Authority of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the automatic debarment of a petitioner as an allied firm of a debarred entity under MoRTH guidelines, holding that such debarment does not violate natural justice where opportunity of hearing is provided.
Nirmal Gupta v. Ram Niwas Gupta
The High Court set aside the civil imprisonment order against the judgment debtor on his undertaking to pay the decretal amount in installments within a fixed timeframe, with no further extensions allowed.
Pravesh Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's bail application in a serious property fraud case involving forged documents, holding that his central role in the conspiracy and strong prima facie evidence justified continued custody.
Chhote Lal v. State of NCT of Delhi
Anticipatory bail was denied to the petitioner accused of central involvement in a property fraud conspiracy involving forged documents and prior evasion of arrest.
Chirag Sharma & Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would be unjust.
Sukhjit Singh & Ors. v. The State of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 506, and 34 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement and full and final compromise between the parties in a matrimonial dispute.
Subhash & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act on the ground of settlement between parties and discontinuance of prosecution by the complainant.
Shubham Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail to an accused ATM operator alleged to have stolen Rs. 7.41 lakh, relying on physical and documentary evidence and rejecting unsubstantiated claims of prior resignation.
Sanjay Kumar & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT Delhi) and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed FIR No. 260/2022 involving offences under Sections 323, 354(B), 379, 509, and 34 IPC on the ground of compromise between parties, subject to payment of costs.
Mr. Amit Choudhary; Ms. Akansha Mehra v. SHARP CORP LTD
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash a complaint under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, holding that defects in the Board Resolution authorizing prosecution do not warrant quashing and are matters for trial court determination.
Kaptan Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 363 IPC on the ground of compromise and settled family life, allowing the petition in the interest of justice.
Amit Arora v. Tarun Sethi
The Delhi High Court disposed of the landlord-tenant appeal by recording an amicable settlement directing the tenant to vacate the property and clear rent arrears by a specified date, with a moratorium on execution proceedings.
Sunil Kumar v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a Section 308/34 IPC case subject to bond and surety, warning him against non-appearance and witness tampering.
Pawan v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for rape and related offences under IPC and POCSO Act, holding that the reliable testimony of the child victim corroborated by forensic evidence sufficed to invoke the presumption of guilt under Section 29 of the POCSO Act, which the appellant failed to rebut.
IDBI Bank Ltd v. P D Gupta and Company
The Delhi High Court upheld the refund of Rs. 1 crore with interest to a buyer who paid under an unsanctioned One-Time Settlement proposal, holding that the bank could not appropriate the amount without the buyer's consent.
Shantanu Prakash v. Doris Chug Gim Lian
The Delhi High Court held that delay in filing Written Statements beyond 120 days under its Rules cannot be condoned, affirming the mandatory nature of procedural timelines and rejecting discretionary extensions.
Reckitt Benckiser (India) Private Limited v. Sauss Home Products Private Limited
Delhi High Court granted interim injunction to plaintiff in trademark passing off suit, rejecting defendant's jurisdictional and prior use claims based on fabricated evidence.
Amit Kumar and Others v. State of NCT of Delhi and Another
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement and compromise between the parties, holding that prosecution was not in the interest of justice.