Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Rinkoo Singh
The Delhi High Court held the insurance policy valid and the insurer liable to pay compensation for a bus explosion caused by rash and negligent driving, remanding claims for fresh assessment.
Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Rinkoo Singh
The Delhi High Court held the insurer liable to pay compensation for a bus explosion caused by rash and negligent driving, affirming the validity of the insurance Cover Note absent proof of fraud, and remanded for assessment of claims.
Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Rinkoo Singh & Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld insurer liability under a valid insurance Cover Note for a fatal bus explosion caused by driver negligence, rejecting insurer's fraud claims and remanding for compensation assessment.
Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Rinkoo Singh & Ors
The Delhi High Court held the insurance Cover Note valid and insurer liable for compensation arising from a bus explosion caused by driver and conductor's negligence, remanding claims for reassessment.
Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Rinkoo Singh & Ors
The Delhi High Court held the insurance Cover Note valid, found the driver negligent causing a fatal bus explosion, and remanded claims for compensation assessment, holding the insurer liable subject to seating capacity.
Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Rinkoo Singh & Ors
Delhi High Court held the insurance Cover Note valid, insurer liable for compensation for a bus explosion caused by driver and conductor's negligence, and remanded claims for assessment.
Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Rinkoo Singh & Ors
Delhi High Court held insurer liable to pay compensation for a bus explosion accident caused by rash driving and gas leakage, rejecting insurer's fraud plea and remanding claims for assessment.
Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Rinkoo Singh & Ors
The Delhi High Court held the insurer liable to pay compensation for a bus explosion caused by rash and negligent driving despite allegations of fraudulent insurance, remanding claims for reassessment under the Motor Vehicles Act.
Jaspal Singh & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings based on an amicable settlement between the parties under Section 482 CrPC, as the complainant no longer wished to prosecute.
Amrit Lal v. The State
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC on the ground of an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's unwillingness to prosecute further.
Shashi Sharma & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's decision to discontinue prosecution.
Mohd Iqbal v. Mohd Awalin
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant’s appeal against eviction as withdrawn and stayed execution of the eviction order until 31.03.2021 subject to the tenant’s undertaking to vacate and pay use and occupation charges.
Sheila Gujral & Anr v. Joban Kaur Puri
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition against eviction as withdrawn on the tenant's undertaking to vacate the premises and pay dues, staying execution of the eviction order until compliance.
Deepak Kaur v. New Delhi Municipal Council
The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging NDMC's requirement of co-owners' consent for building plan sanction after the parties reached a family settlement and undertook to comply with municipal formalities.
Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Rinkoo Singh & Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld insurer liability for compensation in a bus explosion case, rejecting insurer's fraud claims and affirming driver negligence despite seating capacity breach.
Ranbir Singh v. Jiya Rani @ Jiya Joshi & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that a landlord with better title than the tenant can evict on bonafide necessity without proving absolute ownership.
Anil Chamola v. State
The Delhi High Court declined anticipatory bail to Anil Chamola in a cheating and criminal conspiracy case due to prima facie evidence of fraudulent financial transactions and the necessity of custodial interrogation.
Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Rinkoo Singh & Ors
The Delhi High Court held the insurer liable to pay compensation for a bus explosion caused by rash and negligent driving, affirming the validity of the insurance Cover Note absent proven fraud, and remanded claims for fresh assessment.
Anup Kumar Sinha v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition, upholding the conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, holding that the petitioner failed to rebut the statutory presumption of liability for cheque dishonor.
R.S. v. State
The Delhi High Court directed interim protective measures and a confidential investigation into allegations of illegal confinement and abuse involving elderly parties with mental health issues, emphasizing medical assessment and binding consensual arrangements.