Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
M/S ASHOK SHARMA & ASSOCIATES PRIVATE LIMITED v. M/S DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LIMITED
The Delhi High Court granted a four-month extension for completion of arbitral proceedings and passing of the award under Section 29A of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 with the parties' consent.
Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Rinkoo Singh & Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld insurer's liability to pay compensation for a bus explosion accident, rejecting insurer's fraud plea and affirming driver negligence despite overloading and hazardous carriage.
Re-Attar Filte Limited v. Official Liquidator
The Delhi High Court permitted the Official Liquidator to release available funds to the sole claimant, dissolve the company in liquidation, and discharge the Official Liquidator from further duties upon completion of the liquidation process.
Gaurav and Ors. v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of Directive 32 prohibiting lateral transfers from RPSF to RPF, dismissing petitions seeking such transfers as a matter of right.
The New India Assurance Co Ltd v. Arjun Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court partially allowed the insurer's appeal by deducting double-reimbursed medical expenses and upheld disability compensation based on actual functional impairment, rejecting contributory negligence due to lack of intoxication evidence.
M/S. AADINATH INDUSTRIES & ANR. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Delhi High Court allowed a writ petition directing authorities to permit re-filing of GST TRAN-1 Form to enable the petitioner to avail Input Tax Credit despite technical glitches on the GST portal.
State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) v. Sandeep Madaan; State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) v. Pushpa Madaan
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's leave to appeal petitions, upholding the trial court's acquittal of accused in a POCSO case due to unexplained delay, unreliable child testimony, and lack of corroborative evidence.
Raj Narain Jha v. Jagdish & Ors
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and remanded the motor accident compensation claim for fresh consideration under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, emphasizing the principle of no fault liability despite contributory negligence.
Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Rinkoo Singh & Ors
The Delhi High Court held the insurer liable to pay compensation for a bus explosion caused by rash and negligent driving, rejecting insurer's fraud plea due to lack of evidence and remanded for reassessment of claims.
Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Rinkoo Singh & Ors
The Delhi High Court held the insurance Cover Note valid, found the insurer liable for compensation due to rash and negligent driving causing a fatal bus explosion, and remanded claims for assessment under the Motor Vehicles Act.
Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Rinkoo Singh & Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld insurer's liability to pay compensation for a bus explosion caused by rash driving and gas leakage, rejecting insurer's fraud claims and limiting liability to the seating capacity covered by the valid insurance policy.
Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Rinkoo Singh & Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld insurer's liability to pay compensation for a bus explosion accident, rejecting insurer's fraud plea and affirming validity of the insurance Cover Note issued before the accident.
Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Rinkoo Singh & Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld insurer's liability to pay compensation for a fatal bus explosion caused by rash driving and gas leakage, holding the insurance Cover Note valid despite fraud allegations, and remanded claims for assessment.
Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Rinkoo Singh & Ors
The Delhi High Court held the insurer liable to pay compensation for a bus explosion caused by rash and negligent driving, affirming the validity of the insurance Cover Note despite allegations of fraud, and remanded claims for assessment.
Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Rinkoo Singh & Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld insurer's liability to compensate victims of a bus explosion caused by rash driving and rejected insurer's plea of fraudulent insurance policy for lack of evidence.
Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Rinkoo Singh
The Delhi High Court held the insurer liable to pay compensation under a valid insurance cover note despite allegations of fraud, finding rash and negligent driving caused the accident, and remanded for assessment of claims.
Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Rinkoo Singh & Ors
The Delhi High Court held the insurer liable to pay compensation for a bus explosion caused by rash and negligent driving, affirming the validity of the insurance policy and remanding claims for assessment.
Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Rinkoo Singh
Delhi High Court held the insurance Cover Note valid and insurer liable for compensation in a bus explosion accident caused by rash driving and negligence, remanding claims for assessment.
Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Rinkoo Singh & Ors
The Delhi High Court held the insurer liable to pay compensation for a bus explosion caused by rash and negligent driving despite allegations of fraud, remanding claims for assessment under the Motor Vehicles Act.
Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Rinkoo Singh & Ors
The Delhi High Court held the insurance cover note valid and insurer liable for compensation arising from a fatal bus explosion caused by rash and negligent driving, rejecting fraud allegations and remanding claims for assessment.