Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Rakesh Singh v. Union of India
The judgment in W.P.(O) 2777/2019 refers to the decision in W.P.(O) 9365/2018 involving the University of Delhi, with no further details provided.
The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Poonam & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the compensation award in a fatal motor accident claim, rejecting contributory negligence, correcting minimum wage for calculation, and awarding additional damages for loss of love and affection and other heads as per Supreme Court precedents.
M/S RAMACIVIL INDIA CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. v. DELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.
The Delhi High Court held that where an internal dispute resolution committee is not constituted, a party may directly seek appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, and appointed a sole arbitrator accordingly.
Shri Saurabh Tripathy v. Competition Commission of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Competition Commission's discretion to reject the Director General's report and close the case without further inquiry, holding that negotiated contractual terms are a vital factor in assessing abuse of dominant position claims under the Competition Act.
Mustkeem Kuraisi & Ors. v. Mohd Anish & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced the compensation in a motor accident claim to include loss of future prospects, loss of consortium, and loss of love and affection, following Supreme Court precedents.
Nardev @ Sonu v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a genuine school leaving certificate is conclusive proof of juvenility under Section 7A of the JJ Act, 2000, and ordered trial of the accused before the Juvenile Justice Board, overruling the medical age report.
Prashant Gupta v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of appellants for armed robbery and criminal conspiracy based on credible eyewitness testimony, recoveries, and identification despite absence of public witnesses.
Prashant Gupta v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of appellants for armed robbery and criminal conspiracy based on credible eyewitness identification, recoveries, and consistent prosecution evidence despite absence of public witnesses.
Prashant Gupta v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of appellants for armed robbery under Sections 392 and 120B IPC based on credible eyewitness identification and lawful recoveries, dismissing their appeals.
Islam v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant due to material discrepancies in prosecution evidence and failure to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt in an attempted robbery case.
Manish Divedi v. Smt Jyotsana
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order granting ad-interim maintenance of Rs. 10,000 per month to the wife under Section 125 Cr.P.C., emphasizing the husband's obligation to maintain the wife despite her capacity to earn.
Vijay v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for penetrative sexual assault on a minor under POCSO and IPC, holding that consistent and credible child testimony suffices even without corroborative medical or forensic evidence.
INOX AIR PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED v. RATHI ISPAT LIMITED
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award holding leased plant as movable property, dismissed challenges based on res judicata and public policy, and addressed contempt allegations regarding removal of inventorised equipment.
Suresh Chand Goel & Sons (HUF) & Anr. v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal directing maintenance of status quo and restraining respondents from constructing on disputed land after quashing of acquisition award and restoration of mutation entries in appellants' favor.
Rakesh Kumar Verma & Ors. v. Radha Krishan Verma & Ors.
The Delhi High Court modified a partition decree to allow sale of property and equitable distribution of proceeds due to impracticality of physical partition and municipal restrictions, while protecting life interests under the Will.
Nand Ram v. Kanwal Singh & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Plaintiff's partition suit relying on binding admissions of prior family settlements and held that such admissions bar reopening settled partition issues after decades.
Rajiv Gupta v. L. R. Gupta, HUF & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the application to set aside a compromise decree in a partition suit, holding that the defendant had knowledge of the suit and was not prevented from appearing, thus upholding the validity of the compromise.
Basant Projects Ltd v. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd.
The Delhi High Court granted a six-month extension for completion of arbitral proceedings and passing of the award under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, with the consent of both parties.
Kings Furnishing & Safecompany v. Central University of Jharkhand
The Delhi High Court granted a seven-month extension for completion of arbitral proceedings and passing of the award under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, on mutual consent and ongoing proceedings.