Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Dr. Ravinder Chaudary and Anr. v. The Veterinary Council of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the expeditious holding of elections for the eleven elected members of the Veterinary Council of India before conducting elections for the President and Vice President, ensuring compliance with the Indian Veterinary Council Act, 1984 and Rules, 1985.
Dr. Ravinder Chaudary and Anr. v. The Veterinary Council of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the proper constitution of the Veterinary Council of India by holding elections for elected members before electing the President and Vice President, ensuring compliance with the Indian Veterinary Council Act, 1984 and Rules, 1985.
Dr. Ravinder Chaudary and Anr. v. The Veterinary Council of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the proper constitution of the Veterinary Council of India by holding elections for elected members as per statutory provisions before electing the President and Vice President, ensuring compliance with the Indian Veterinary Council Act, 1984 and Rules, 1985.
Neeraj Kumar v. Ram Mandal
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's revision petition against eviction on bona fide necessity grounds, stayed execution of the eviction order upon the tenant's undertaking to vacate and clear dues by a specified date.
Zakir v. Maqbool Ahmed
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging eviction on bona fide necessity grounds, holding that tenancy rights do not confer ownership and the petitioner failed to raise a triable issue disputing landlord's ownership.
Geeta Kapoor v. Jaipal & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that the landlord's bona fide necessity and better title suffice for eviction, and a tenant admitting tenancy cannot challenge title.
Roshan Lal & Anr v. Shanker Gupta
The Delhi High Court held that where a tenant raises triable issues disputing the landlord's bonafide necessity for eviction under the Delhi Rent Control Act, leave to defend must be granted and eviction cannot be ordered summarily.
Nanak Chand @ Nanak Ram v. Rajinder Kumar Ratawal
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of petition challenging eviction and stayed execution of eviction order subject to petitioners' undertaking to vacate premises by a specified date and pay use and occupation charges.
Veena Devi v. Container Corporation of India Ltd.
The Delhi High Court quashed a punitive transfer order issued without following disciplinary procedures, reaffirming that transfer orders cannot be used as a substitute for punishment.
The New India Assurance Co Ltd v. Chanan Singh
The Delhi High Court held that an insurer is entitled to recover compensation paid from the insured owner if the owner fails to produce required documents evidencing compliance with insurance policy conditions.
Nitin Mavi & Ors v. State (Govt. of N.C.T of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the married parties, holding that further prosecution would serve no useful purpose.
Parveen Gupta & Anr v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings based on an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's withdrawal of prosecution.
Ashutosh Garg v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings based on an amicable settlement between the parties and their consent to discontinue prosecution.
Suresh Chand v. Union of India and Ors.
Delhi High Court directed the Central Administrative Tribunal to expeditiously hear the petitioner’s interim relief application against termination for non-fulfillment of recruitment conditions, emphasizing timely judicial intervention to protect livelihood.
Pawan Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court set aside the conviction under Section 354A IPC due to unreliable sole witness testimony and failure to comply with Section 313 CrPC procedural requirements.
TCI Freight (A Division of Transport Corporation of India Limited) v. M/S Indian Oil Corporation Limited
The Delhi High Court condoned delay in refiling an arbitration petition and directed the parties to resolve their contractual disputes through arbitration at DIAC, leaving limitation objections to the arbitrator.
Sushma Raina v. Canara Bank and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the amended pre-deposit provisions of the RDDB & FI Act, 2016 do not apply retrospectively to appeals filed before the amendment, restoring the appellate tribunal's discretion to waive pre-deposit under the unamended law.
Yaman Kumar Sharma v. University of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the admission of candidates delayed by the University's fault in completing internship before the cut-off date, emphasizing fairness and merit over rigid adherence to administrative deadlines.
Ombir & Anr v. Lt. Governor of NCT of Delhi & Chairman of Delhi Development Authority & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that the DDA cannot retrospectively limit the petitioners' vested right to three chances for alternative plot allotment under the 1961 Scheme and directed allotment accordingly.
Airports Authority of India v. Yashpal Singh Tanwar
The High Court held that execution of an Industrial Tribunal award must adhere to its terms and be filed within limitation, quashing an order granting back wages from an earlier date and allowing a delayed execution petition.