Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Sushil Kumar v. Rama Mehta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's petition and upheld eviction on bona fide necessity grounds under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, affirming the landlord's right to use the premises for personal use including a legal office.
Bijender Gupta v. Hardawari Lal
The Delhi High Court held that absolute ownership is not required for eviction under Sections 14(1)(a) and 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, and remitted the eviction petition for fresh consideration on merits.
M/S Gurunanak Fashion Studio Pvt. Ltd. v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court held that challenges to sealing and demolition of residential premises used for commercial purposes must be addressed before the Monitoring Committee, dismissing the petition for interim relief and directing the petitioner to approach the Committee.
Zuber Khan & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and criminal proceedings arising from a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement between the parties recorded before the Family Court.
Gaurav Arora & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings in a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and the complainant's withdrawal of prosecution.
Deepu Kumar v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings based on an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's no objection to prosecution.
Delhi Transport Corporation v. Inderjit
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's order reinstating a workman with continuity of service and 50% backwages after the rejection of approval for his removal under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
The Govt. of NCT of Delhi v. Kamlesh Rani Bhatla
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Government's appeal, holding that without an inquiry, framing of charges does not bar withdrawal of resignation and reinstatement of a government servant.
SMS Limited v. Delhi State Industrial & Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the respondent's cancellation of a tender and refusal to award contract to the petitioner, holding that such administrative decisions are not subject to judicial interference unless arbitrary or mala fide.
M/S. SANTUR CONSTRUCTION & FINANCE (P) LTD v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking to revive long-barred land acquisition claims under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, holding that stale claims with inordinate delay and laches cannot be entertained.
M/S TAROUNI CONSTRUCTION&FINANCE (P) LTD v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging land acquisition proceedings after over three decades, holding that Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act does not revive stale claims barred by delay and laches.
M/S Samman Construction & Finance (P) Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging land acquisition proceedings as barred by delay and laches, holding that Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act does not revive stale claims and the acquisition was validly completed.
M/S. DHOOP CHAWN CONSTRUCTION &FINANCE (P) LTD v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging land acquisition proceedings after over three decades, holding that Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act cannot revive stale claims barred by delay and laches.
M/S. SANTUR CONSTRUCTION & FINANCE (P) LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging decades-old land acquisition proceedings, holding that Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act does not revive stale claims barred by delay and laches, and a subsequent purchaser without valid title lacks locus standi.
Vidhanashi Kamalia & Anr. v. University of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the University of Delhi's practice of shifting meritorious reserved category candidates to the unreserved category list in subsequent admission rounds, affirming that reservation provisions cannot disadvantage meritorious reserved candidates.
Roshan Lal v. Delhi Jal Board
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and refused to condone delay, upholding termination of service for prolonged unauthorized absence and affirming limited judicial interference in disciplinary matters.
SHIVAAI INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED v. DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and refused to condone a 427-day delay in re-filing a Section 34 petition challenging an arbitral award, emphasizing strict adherence to limitation periods under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Svitzer Hazira Pvt. Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
The Bombay High Court held that prior approval under Section 151 of the Income Tax Act must be obtained before issuing a reopening notice under Section 148, and failure to do so renders the notice invalid and liable to be quashed.
Dal Singh and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
Delhi High Court held that Inspectors who attained grade pay ₹ 4800/- via ACP are entitled to non-functional upgradation to ₹ 5400/- after four years, overruling restrictive executive circulars.
Rao Adal Singh College of Education v. National Council for Teacher Education and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the National Council for Teacher Education's regulatory decisions, dismissing the petition challenging the withdrawal of recognition of the petitioner college.