Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Manuel Frederik Baumann v. State of NCT & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that child counsellor reports prepared during mediation in custody disputes are not subject to absolute confidentiality and must be disclosed to parties to serve the child's best interest.
M/S SMC COMRADE LTD v. M/S NARNOLI BUILLION & ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding the suit for recovery of money barred by limitation, applying Article 113 of the Limitation Act and rejecting the appellant's claim of fraud under Section 17.
LARK LABOURATORIES (INDIA) LTD. v. EMPLOYEES' STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION
The Delhi High Court remanded the petitioner's tender rejection for reconsideration by the Technical Evaluation Committee in light of additional documents proving the validity of the drug manufacturing license.
North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr. v. Prema Rai
The Delhi High Court held that a claim against the North Delhi Municipal Corporation was not maintainable before the CAT after the transfer of services to the Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board under the DUSIB Act, 2010.
Government of NCT of Delhi v. L.K. Bahl
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT order directing grant of Selection Grade under CAS to a Lecturer appointed before 1996 without a Master's degree, affirming AICTE exemptions and preventing discriminatory denial of benefits.
Ram Singh & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and divorce decree in a matrimonial dispute.
Puneet Solanki & Ors. v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 420, 468, 471, and 120B IPC based on a bona fide settlement between the parties, holding that no useful purpose would be served by continuing criminal proceedings.
Devender Rai v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of an accused found in possession of 12 kilograms of Ganja, holding that the seriousness of the offense and quantity recovered do not warrant bail under the NDPS Act.
M/S Venus Industries and Anr. v. Government of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to adjudicate a Show Cause Notice concerning 133 kg of gold in accordance with law despite the petitioners' failure to file a timely reply.
Blue Whale Enterprises India Private Limited and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that no court fee is payable for revision applications relating to rebate claims under Section 35EE(3) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, quashing the Revisional Authority's dismissal on non-payment of court fee and remanding the matter for fresh adjudication on merits.
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Shafiya & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurer's appeal against a compensation award for injuries sustained in a motor accident, holding that compensation for injuries is valid even if death occurs years later.
Shriram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Bhudev Tiwari
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurer's appeal, holding that mere mention of 'Without Licence' in the accident report does not prove a fake driving licence, and the insurer failed to discharge the burden of proof to deny liability.
Balram Rastogi v. Kamal Aggarwal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's revision petition against eviction on bona fide necessity grounds, stayed execution of the eviction order until June 2021 subject to the tenant's undertaking to vacate and pay use and occupation charges.
Inder Kumar & Anr v. Braham Parkash
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioners to withdraw their revision petition against eviction and stayed the eviction order subject to their undertaking to vacate the premises by a specified date and pay use and occupation charges.
Virender Pal v. Zahirruddin & Anr
The High Court granted leave to defend to the tenant in an eviction petition under the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that triable issues of possession and tenancy require adjudication on merits.
X Minor v. State
The Delhi High Court held that time limits for juvenile inquiry are directory, not mandatory, but terminated the inquiry after an excessive five-year delay frustrated the statute's purpose.
Ramesh Sharma v. State
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to recall and cross-examine a prosecution witness under Section 311 Cr.P.C., emphasizing the primacy of a fair trial over procedural delay.
Rohit Basoya v. The State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings therefrom on the ground of amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's no objection to prosecution.
Amitab Sen v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings based on an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's unwillingness to prosecute.
Gajender Shokeen @ Sonu & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR and proceedings after the parties amicably settled and resumed cohabitation, with the complainant withdrawing prosecution.