Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Suraj Parkash Manchanda v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking directions to fix circle rates for properties, holding that such fixation is a complex government policy decision not subject to judicial mandamus.
Ritika Juneja v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking deletion of a trial court observation that the petitioner and her father would not communicate with a third party, holding that the observation did not prejudice the petitioner.
GAIL GAS LTD. v. PALAK CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD.
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award largely, limiting judicial interference to patent illegality and reasonable contract interpretation, partially modifying the award on specific claims.
Pratibha Chauhan v. State Election Commission
The Delhi High Court dismissed Letters Patent Appeals against an adjournment order, holding such appeals not maintainable and directing the appellant to seek preponement before the Single Judge.
Salman Khurshid v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed the State's appeal to set aside the discharge of Dr. Sharda Nayak, upheld the summoning of other accused, and remitted the case for fresh consideration of charges based on the entire evidence including supplementary investigation.
Ajit Mittal v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings under Sections 287 and 304A IPC based on a bona fide settlement and compensation paid to the deceased's legal heirs.
Rajendra Yadav & Anr. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs and criminal proceedings arising therefrom after the parties amicably settled their disputes through a compromise deed.
National Bal Bhawan v. Vandana
The Delhi High Court held that employees of an autonomous society funded by the Central Government are entitled to gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, as they do not hold posts under the Central Government.
National Bal Bhawan v. Vandana
The Delhi High Court held that employees of a government-funded autonomous society are entitled to gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, rejecting the petitioner's claim that respondents were government employees excluded from the Act.
Union of India v. R.C. Rangray and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's direction to promote SC/ST diploma holders to Executive Engineer posts applying relaxed standards validated by constitutional amendments and Supreme Court rulings.
National Bal Bhawan v. Vandana
The Delhi High Court held that employees of an autonomous society funded by the Central Government are entitled to gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, rejecting the petitioner's claim of exclusion as Government employees.
National Bal Bhawan v. Vandana
The Delhi High Court held that employees of an autonomous society funded by the Central Government are entitled to gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, rejecting the petitioner's claim of exclusion under Section 2(e).
Tahasjeet v. Jagdish Kumar
The Delhi High Court allowed recovery of earnest money with interest where the seller failed to prove loss or ownership, setting aside the Trial Court's denial despite dismissal of specific performance claim.
Saroj Rani v. Manju Gupta
The Delhi High Court set aside an eviction order due to a technical defect in the eviction petition and allowed withdrawal with liberty to refile after rectification.
Singh Gun House v. Ashish Singhania (HUF)
The Delhi High Court allowed the tenant to withdraw the eviction appeal on bona fide necessity grounds subject to an undertaking to vacate the premises by a specified date and pay use and occupation charges.
Paramjeet Singh v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 287 and 304A IPC on the basis of a bona fide compromise with enhanced compensation, subject to payment within a stipulated time.
Vishnu Kumar Yadav v. State (GNCT Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR under Section 363 IPC for child kidnapping, holding that such serious offences cannot be quashed merely on the basis of a compromise.
Rajender Kumar Lohia v. Sunita Maini & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an eviction petition pleading bonafide necessity without specifically stating absence of reasonably suitable accommodation discloses a cause of action and set aside its dismissal under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.
Vikash Kumar Sharma v. State
Bail was denied to the petitioner accused of trafficking high quality counterfeit currency under UAPA and IPC, as the court found the accusations prima facie true based on recovery and call records.
Mohit Sharma v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the husband accused of dowry harassment and dowry death, holding that serious allegations and evidence warranted denial of bail.