Full Text
Translation output
W.P.(Crl.) 3319/2019 & W.P.(Crl.) 3320/2019 1
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: November 27, 2019
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: November 27, 2019
W.P.(CRL) 3319/2019 & Crl.M.A. 41290/2019
RAJENDRA YADAV & ANR. ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. R.N.Sharma & Mr. Avinash Vasts, Advocates with petitioners in person
RAJENDRA YADAV & ANR. ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. R.N.Sharma & Mr. Avinash Vasts, Advocates with petitioners in person
VERSUS
THE STATE & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Additional Standing Counsel for respondent
No.1/State with SI Dharmender Mr. Rajender Yadav, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person.
Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Additional Standing Counsel for respondent
No.1/State with SI Dharmender Mr. Rajender Yadav, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person.
W.P.(CRL) 3320/2019 & Crl.M.A. 41293/2019
ANIL KUMAR & ORS. ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. Rajender Yadav, Advocate with petitioners in person
ANIL KUMAR & ORS. ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. Rajender Yadav, Advocate with petitioners in person
VERSUS
THE STATE & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Additional Standing Counsel for respondent
No.1/State with SI Dharmender Mr. R.N.Sharma & Mr. Avinash Vasts, Advocates with respondents
No.2 & 3 in person.
2019:DHC:6440 W.P.(Crl.) 3319/2019 & W.P.(Crl.) 3320/2019 2
Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Additional Standing Counsel for respondent
No.1/State with SI Dharmender Mr. R.N.Sharma & Mr. Avinash Vasts, Advocates with respondents
No.2 & 3 in person.
2019:DHC:6440 W.P.(Crl.) 3319/2019 & W.P.(Crl.) 3320/2019 2
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI
JUDGMENT
BRIJESH SETHI, J (oral)
In the above captioned first petition, quashing of FIR
No.391/2019, under Section 380/451 IPC and in the above captioned second petition, quashing of FIR No.340/2019, under Sections
323/336/451 /506/34 IPC, both registered at police station Dwarka North, New Delhi, is sought on the ground that the dispute between the parties has been amicably resolved in terms of Settlement/Compromise Deed of
18th November, 2019.
Since the subject matter of these two FIRs is essentially similar, with the consent of counsel representing both the sides, these petitions have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.
Notice.
Mr. Sanjay Lao, learned Standing Counsel for respondent/State accepts notice and submits that petitioners as well as complainants of FIR in question are present in the Court and they have been duly identified by
Investigating Officer of these cases.
Complainants of these FIRs submit that the dispute inter se has been amicably resolved and now, no grievance against each other
W.P.(Crl.) 3319/2019 & W.P.(Crl.) 3320/2019 3 survives and, therefore, the proceedings arising out of FIR in question be brought to an end.
Heard.
Since the subject matter of these FIRs stands mutually and amicably resolved between the parties, no useful purpose would be served in continuation of the proceedings arising therefrom.
In view of the above, FIR No.391/2019, under Section 380/451
IPC and in the above captioned second petition, quashing of FIR
No.340/2019, under Sections 323/336/451 /506/34 IPC, both registered at police station Dwarka North, New Delhi and proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed.
The petitions and applications stand disposed of.
(BRIJESH SETHI)
JUDGE
NOVEMBER 27, 2019 r
In the above captioned first petition, quashing of FIR
No.391/2019, under Section 380/451 IPC and in the above captioned second petition, quashing of FIR No.340/2019, under Sections
323/336/451 /506/34 IPC, both registered at police station Dwarka North, New Delhi, is sought on the ground that the dispute between the parties has been amicably resolved in terms of Settlement/Compromise Deed of
18th November, 2019.
Since the subject matter of these two FIRs is essentially similar, with the consent of counsel representing both the sides, these petitions have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.
Notice.
Mr. Sanjay Lao, learned Standing Counsel for respondent/State accepts notice and submits that petitioners as well as complainants of FIR in question are present in the Court and they have been duly identified by
Investigating Officer of these cases.
Complainants of these FIRs submit that the dispute inter se has been amicably resolved and now, no grievance against each other
W.P.(Crl.) 3319/2019 & W.P.(Crl.) 3320/2019 3 survives and, therefore, the proceedings arising out of FIR in question be brought to an end.
Heard.
Since the subject matter of these FIRs stands mutually and amicably resolved between the parties, no useful purpose would be served in continuation of the proceedings arising therefrom.
In view of the above, FIR No.391/2019, under Section 380/451
IPC and in the above captioned second petition, quashing of FIR
No.340/2019, under Sections 323/336/451 /506/34 IPC, both registered at police station Dwarka North, New Delhi and proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed.
The petitions and applications stand disposed of.
(BRIJESH SETHI)
JUDGE
NOVEMBER 27, 2019 r