Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Niraj Kumar Pandey v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Ors
The Delhi High Court quashed FIR No. 294/2016 and all proceedings based on an amicable settlement between the parties and their consent to discontinue prosecution.
Sh. Vikas & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings in a matrimonial dispute after the parties amicably settled and the complainant expressed no desire to continue prosecution.
Devesh Gupta v. Ramjas Foundation and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that removal of a nominated chairman by a private school’s managing committee is a private law matter not amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226, dismissing the petitioner’s writ petition.
Raj Rani Arora v. Vasu & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that mere overloading of passengers does not constitute a fundamental breach of the insurance contract, and the insurer is liable to pay compensation for the insured number of passengers, while condoning delay in filing appeals subject to environmental conditions.
J S Sharma & Sons v. Shiv Devi Meena
The Delhi High Court upheld the setting aside of abatement of an eviction petition under Order XXII Rule 9 CPC on sufficient cause, dismissing tenants' claim of vested right due to delay in impleading legal heirs.
Pawan Sharma v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR and proceedings following an amicable settlement and withdrawal of prosecution by the complainant.
24e53b625475959ee9534bd6b3f9e66f4928ff99257796c17fb7ae0fd8e90822
The court held that chit fund operations must strictly comply with statutory provisions, and mismanagement entitles subscribers to relief, directing rectification and refund in a dispute under the Tamil Nadu Chit Funds Act, 1982.
A. MAHALAKSHMI v. BALA VENKATRAM & ANR.
The Supreme Court restored the eviction decree on the ground of sub-letting, holding that the landlord proved exclusive possession by the sub-tenant and that the claimed partnership was a sham to conceal sub-letting.
0b279b50a9e3404074b2ac0739de0336fe3b97599fe3ca8231b6e6e64cd50571
The court upheld the validity of a registered sale deed and the petitioner's possession, dismissing the respondent's challenge in a property ownership dispute.
A. Mahalakshmi v. Bala Venkatram & Anr.
The Supreme Court restored the eviction decree on the ground of sub-letting, holding that exclusive possession by a third party without landlord's consent constitutes sub-letting under rent control law.
Myakala Dharmarajam & Ors. v. The State of Telangana & Anr.
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's cancellation of bail, holding that vague allegations without specific evidence do not justify cancelling bail granted by the Sessions Court.
Myakala Dharmarajam & Ors. v. The State of Telangana & Anr.
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's cancellation of bail, holding that vague allegations of witness intimidation do not justify interference with a Sessions Court's bail order absent perversity.
Ananta Kamilya v. State of West Bengal
The Supreme Court modified the conviction from murder under Section 302 IPC to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part I IPC, holding that the death occurred in a sudden fight without intention to kill.
Ramkhiladi & Anr. v. The United India Insurance Company & Anr.
The Supreme Court held that a borrower of a vehicle is not a third party under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act and thus cannot claim compensation from the insurer of that vehicle, limiting compensation to Rs. 1 lakh as per the insurance contract.
Ramkhiladi & Anr. v. The United India Insurance Company & Anr.
The Supreme Court held that a borrower of a vehicle is not a third party under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act and thus cannot claim compensation from the insurer of that vehicle when the negligent vehicle's owner and insurer are not parties to the claim.
Purshottam Chopra v. State (NCT of Delhi Government)
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under Section 302 IPC based on reliable dying declarations despite procedural lapses, affirming their admissibility and evidentiary value.
Purshottam Chopra & Anr. v. State (Govt. of NCT Delhi)
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction based on reliable dying declarations recorded by medical and police officers, affirming that such declarations can be sole basis for conviction even without corroboration or recording before a Magistrate.
Purshottam Chopra v. State (NCT of Delhi Government)
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of appellants for murder based on reliable dying declarations and corroborative evidence, affirming that such declarations can be sole basis for conviction if credible.
Purshottam Chopra v. State (Govt. of NCT Delhi)
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction based on reliable dying declarations and medical evidence, affirming that procedural lapses in recording such declarations do not invalidate them if the victim was conscious and oriented.
Union of India v. Reliance Communication Limited & Anr.
The Supreme Court upheld TDSAT's order directing the Union of India to refund excess bank guarantee amounts encashed beyond admitted deferred spectrum charges after fresh guarantees were furnished by the licensees.