Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Amit Singh & Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on a voluntary amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Rehan Khan & Ors. v. State Through SHO & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties in a matrimonial dispute, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Gaurav Kumar Sharma & Anr. v. State of NCT & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and divorce between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process in matrimonial disputes.
Dr. Kamal Rawal v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354/354(A)/354(B) IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Vishal Kalhan v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279/337 IPC following an amicable settlement, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Aditya Vikram Singh Sethi v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act following an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Mohd. Raju @ Raju v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under POCSO Act based on credible testimony and DNA evidence but reduced the sentence to the period already served, granting release to the appellant.
Malleeswari v. K. Suguna and Another
The Supreme Court held that the High Court exceeded its review jurisdiction by reappreciating facts in a partition suit amendment application, restoring the Trial Court's dismissal and emphasizing the limited scope of review under CPC.
Haryana Power Purchase Centre v. GMR Kamalanga Energy Limited
The Supreme Court upheld regulatory orders directing pro rata allocation of coal supply and costs among all power purchasers under a thermal power project, dismissing appeals challenging expert bodies' concurrent findings.
Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation v. Mumbai Mahanagarpalika Karyalayeen Karmachari Sanghatana
The Bombay High Court upheld the Industrial Court's interim order restraining the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation from discontinuing long-standing additional increments for LSG and LGS diploma holders without statutory notice under Section 9-A of the Industrial Disputes Act.
Jayant Meghani & Ors. v. M/s Shree Tirupati Greenfield & Ors.
The Bombay High Court upheld an arbitral award holding that disputed investments were loans secured by flats, validated evidence led by a power of attorney holder, and affirmed the interest rates awarded, dismissing all challenges under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
Milind Satish Sawant v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court held that a Designated Court under the MPID Act has jurisdiction to try connected IPC offences and rejected bail for the accused in a large-scale financial fraud case involving criminal breach of trust and cheating.
Mohan Madhav Chaurasiya v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court upheld the life convictions of two accused for murder based on circumstantial evidence, affirming that absence of motive does not preclude conviction if the chain of incriminating circumstances is complete.
Pravin Nathalal Parghi v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Bombay High Court allowed a habeas corpus petition directing custody of a minor twin to the biological father, affirming that illegal detention by a non-guardian justifies writ relief despite pending custody proceedings.
Shivranjan Towers Sahakari Griha Rachana Sanstha Maryadit v. Bhujbal Constructions
The Bombay High Court held that a cooperative society formed by flat purchasers is bound by arbitration clauses in their individual agreements and that challenges to arbitrator jurisdiction under Section 16 are not maintainable by writ petition absent patent lack of jurisdiction.
High Court of Judicature at Bombay v. Nilesh C. Ojha & Ors.
The Bombay High Court affirmed its plenary powers under Article 215 to initiate suo motu contempt proceedings and emphasized that frivolous applications and scandalous statements in court pleadings may attract contempt sanctions.
Shree Dev Shasan Jain Shwetambar Murtipujak Trust v. Veer Tower CHS Ltd.
The Bombay High Court held that a cooperative housing society formed by flat purchasers inherits the arbitration agreements in their individual contracts with the developer, and a third party claiming through the developer can invoke arbitration, directing constitution of an arbitral tribunal to adjudicate the disputes.
Shree Dev Shasan Jain Shwetambar Murtipujak Trust v. Veer Tower CHS Ltd.
The Bombay High Court held that a society formed by flat purchasers inherits the arbitration agreements contained in their individual contracts with the developer, and non-signatory parties claiming through a signatory can enforce arbitration agreements, directing disputes to arbitration.
UOI & Ors. v. Vijay Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court corrected a typographical error in its earlier order, reducing the time frame for completing a Review DPC exercise from twelve months to twelve weeks.
Anish Muralidhar and Capt Karolin Johnson v. COL Ajit Dhaka
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for primary hypertension, affirming the presumption of service connection absent employer's proof to the contrary and limiting its review to errors of law under certiorari jurisdiction.