Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Kiran Pal Singh Tyagi and Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that challenges to rejection of nomination papers during ongoing elections are barred under Article 329(b) and the Representation of Peoples Act, and must be raised only by election petition post-election.
Harinder Singh Kochar & Ors. v. Bule Coast Infrastructure & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a Civil Court cannot restrain parties from pursuing other coercive proceedings pending before different forums, setting aside such a restraint order as without jurisdiction.
Rohit Dhankard v. Vikas Gupta & Ors.
The Court held that a person claiming independent ownership of property must be impleaded as a necessary party in eviction proceedings, though title disputes are to be decided separately.
Naresh Kumar v. Meer Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court’s rejection of a late amendment to the written statement beyond the limited scope permitted, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural timelines in a long-pending suit for specific performance.
Piyoosh Kumar Goyal v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking permission to travel abroad and stay the lookout circular against the petitioner involved in a large-scale tax evasion investigation, citing risk of absconding and ongoing probe.
Lakhan v. State of NCT of Delhi
Bail was denied to the accused in a sexual offence case involving a minor prosecutrix, holding that consent is immaterial when the victim is under 18 years as per documentary evidence.
Rajesh Kumar Vashisht v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 420, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, holding that continuation of proceedings would be futile.
Dhirender Sharma v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 145(2) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the accused must be allowed cross-examination of the complainant's witness upon application, setting aside the trial court's order denying this right.
Rohit Dhankard v. Sandhya Gupta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a person claiming independent ownership of property is a necessary party to eviction proceedings under Section 14(1)(e) of the DRC Act, and set aside orders excluding such person from the eviction petition.
Amit Bhardwaj v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of an FIR alleging assault and criminal intimidation related to a Bitcoin fraud, holding that the FIR prima facie disclosed cognizable offences and no grounds existed for quashing.
The Branch Manager, Indigo Airlines, Kolkata & Anr. v. Kalpana Rani Debbarma & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that failure of passengers to report at the boarding gate within stipulated time constitutes 'Gate No Show' and does not amount to deficiency in service by the airline, dismissing the consumer complaint for compensation.
The Branch Manager, Indigo Airlines, Kolkata & Anr. v. Kalpana Rani Debbarma & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that failure to report at the boarding gate on time constitutes 'Gate No Show' absolving the airline of deficiency in service liability, and dismissed the consumer complaint for lack of proof.
പനൽ വഭദത(കൾ) v.
The court upheld the tribunal's jurisdiction and emphasized adherence to natural justice in disciplinary proceedings, allowing the appeal in part and directing lawful administrative action.
Dr. Vijayakumaran C.P.V. v. Central University of Kerala
The Supreme Court held that a probationary termination based on a formal inquiry report finding misconduct is stigmatic and requires a regular departmental inquiry, setting aside the termination and directing reinstatement.
പനൽ വഭദത(കൾ) v.
The Supreme Court upheld the Consumer Commission's order awarding compensation for deficiency in medical service, dismissing the appeal challenging the finding of negligence and the quantum of compensation.
Dr. Vijayakumaran C.P.V. v. Central University of Kerala
The Supreme Court held that a termination order based on an inquiry report finding serious misconduct is stigmatic and illegal without a regular departmental inquiry, setting aside the termination and directing reinstatement.
Chandeshwar Saw v. Brij Bhushan Prasad
The Supreme Court upheld the Election Tribunal's order directing recount of votes due to irregularities, declared the appellant duly elected under Section 140 of the Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, and set aside the respondent's election.
Chandeshwar Saw v. Brij Bhushan Prasad
The Supreme Court upheld the Election Tribunal's order for recount of votes due to counting irregularities and declared the appellant duly elected under Section 140 of the Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, setting aside the respondent's election.
Kirpal Singh & Ors. v. Kamla Devi & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that pending surplus land determination proceedings under the 1953 Act must be completed under that Act, excluding applicability of the 1972 Act's provisions on permissible area selection, and dismissed the appeal of subsequent purchasers challenging the surplus declaration.
462f775ca10b643466068265f20e7e9248ef48d956cbc3458c16ed84c9ef9c33
The court upheld the conviction by affirming the correct application of evidence law provisions and procedural safeguards, dismissing the appeal.