Rajesh Kumar Vashisht v. State

Delhi High Court · 28 Jan 2020 · 2020:DHC:582
Brijesh Sethi
W.P.(CRL) 251/2020
2020:DHC:582
criminal petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 420, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, holding that continuation of proceedings would be futile.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P.(CRL) 251/2020 1
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: January 28, 2020
W.P.(CRL) 251/2020 & Crl.M.A. 1882/2020
RAJESH KUMAR VASHISHT & ANR. ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. H.S.Yadav, Advocate
VERSUS
STATE & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: Ms. Shivani Sharma & Ms.Charu Chaudhary, Advocates for
Ms.Richa Kapoor, Additional Standing Counsel for respondent
No.1/State with SI Manmohan Yadav Ms. Suraksha Chaudhary, Advocate for respondent No.2
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI
JUDGMENT
BRIJESH SETHI, J (oral)
Vide this petition, quashing of FIR No. 12/2018, registered at police station Dwarka South, New Delhi for the offences under Sections
420/406/34 IPC is sought on the basis of Memorandum of Understanding of 18th April, 2019 reached between the parties.
Notice.
Ms. Shivani Sharma, Advocate, accepts notice for respondent
No.1/State and Ms. Suraksha Chaudhary, Advocate, accepts notice for
2020:DHC:582
W.P.(CRL) 251/2020 2 respondent No.2.
Ms. Shivani Sharma, Advocate for Ms. Richa Kapoor, learned
Additional Standing Counsel for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and he has been identified to be so, by Investigating Officer of this case on the basis of identity proof produced by him.
Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute between the parties has been amicably resolved in terms of Memorandum of Understanding of 18th April, 2019 and he affirms the contents of his
Affidavit of 11th December, 2019 supporting this petition and submits that now no dispute with petitioners survives and so, the proceedings arising out of the FIR in question be brought to an end.
Upon hearing and on perusal of the FIR of this Case, I find that continuance of proceedings arising out of the FIR in question would be an exercise in futility as the misunderstanding, which led to registration of the FIR, now stands cleared between the parties.
Accordingly, this petition is allowed and FIR No. 12/2018, under
Sections 420/406/34 IPC, registered at police station Dwarka South, New Delhi and the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed qua petitioners.
This petition and application stand disposed of accordingly.
(BRIJESH SETHI)
JUDGE
JANUARY 28, 2020 2020:DHC:582