Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Bharat Goyal v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR against the petitioner under multiple IPC sections for false implication in a property dispute, applying inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process.
M/S MANAVI EXIM PVT. LTD. v. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, ICD
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition allowing cancellation and return of the provisional duty bond and bank guarantee after the customs authority cancelled the securities.
Ajit Kumar v. Anil Kumar Gupta
The Delhi High Court upheld the award of 12% interest on Rs.1.10 crores refunded for unjust enrichment due to non-disclosure of mortgage in a property sale agreement, dismissing the appellant's challenge to the interest component.
Vikas v. State (NCT) of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's framing of charges under Sections 417 and 376 IPC, holding that a prima facie case existed despite the prosecutrix's marital status and improvements in her statements.
Satish alias Pintu v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Satish for murder under Section 302 IPC, relying on credible eyewitness and ballistic evidence despite minor discrepancies and procedural challenges to weapon recovery.
Veena Pittie v. State
The Delhi High Court allowed a senior citizen accused's petition for permanent exemption from personal appearance during trial on health grounds, subject to appearing when specifically required by the court.
Alka Rana v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to frame charges expeditiously in a criminal case pending for over four years, emphasizing the right to a speedy trial.
M/S LAXMI AGRO IMPEX INDIA v. M/S LADLI INDIA COMMODITIES
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the modification of an ex parte injunction, permitting the respondent to use a registered trademark pending trial on substantive issues.
R G Overseas v. Adroit Trading Nuts Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that a recovery suit is not liable to be stayed under Section 10 CPC merely because a declaratory suit involving related but distinct issues is pending between the same parties.
Neeraj Kashyap v. M/S ECE Industries Limited Elevator Division
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for reinstatement, holding that the employee abandoned his job through unauthorized absence without medical proof, rendering his termination lawful and no industrial dispute existing.
MS CHARUMATI SHARMA v. B S E S & ORS
Delhi High Court granted interim relief to an elderly petitioner by directing BSES to accept a lump sum payment and restore electricity connection, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. on humanitarian grounds without adjudicating the merits.
Saroj Bala v. Bimla Khatri & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of registered sale documents and Will executed by the deceased owner, applying Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act to bar the plaintiff's claim, and dismissed her suit for possession with costs.
State of M.P. & Anr. v. M.P. Transport Workers Fedn.
The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Madhya Pradesh Labour Laws (Amendment) Act, 2002, holding that transferring trial jurisdiction from Labour Courts back to regular criminal courts does not violate the right to speedy trial under Article 21.
Sushila Aggarwal and others v. State (NCT of Delhi) and another
The Supreme Court clarified that anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is a discretionary remedy without inherent time limits, operative upon arrest, and courts may impose conditions or limit its duration based on case facts, balancing liberty and investigation rights.
Sushila Aggarwal and others v. State (NCT of Delhi) and another
The Supreme Court clarified that anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is a discretionary remedy without inherent time limits, which continues until curtailed or cancelled by the court, balancing individual liberty and police investigation rights.
Mohandas and Others v. State of Maharashtra and Others
The Supreme Court held that reservation of land under a Development Plan does not lapse under Section 127 if a declaration under Section 126(4) is made within ten years, and upheld the continuation of reservation under a revised Development Plan, dismissing the appellants' challenge.
Mohandas and Others v. State of Maharashtra and Others
The Supreme Court held that land reservation under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act does not lapse if a declaration under Section 126(4) is published within ten years, and a revised Development Plan continues the reservation, dismissing the appellants' challenge.
Shripal Bhati & Anr. v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
The Supreme Court upheld the validity of respondent no. 4's appointment and inclusion in NOIDA service on deputation basis, dismissing the appellants' challenge to their promotion rights and procedural objections.
Shripal Bhati v. State of U.P.
The Supreme Court upheld the legality of deputation appointment and absorption of an employee in NOIDA under the 1981 Service Regulations and held that appellants lacking promotion eligibility had no locus standi to challenge the same.
Shripal Bhati & Anr. v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
The Supreme Court upheld the validity of deputation appointment and absorption of an employee into NOIDA service under the relevant service regulations and statutory provisions, dismissing the appellants' challenge to the promotion and appointment process.