Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
The Chief General Manager (Contracts) M/s Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd. v. Driplex Water Engineering Ltd. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the MSEF Council's jurisdiction to refer disputes to arbitration under the MSMED Act, affirming that a supplier registered post-contract under Section 8 is entitled to the Act's benefits and that classification depends on equipment investment, not turnover.
Jammu and Kashmir Bank Limited v. Punjab National Bank and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that after valid assignment of debt and transfer of possession, the assignor bank cannot be held liable in recovery proceedings absent material evidence of collusion.
M/S DELHI GYMKHANA CLUB LTD. v. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL TAX, DELHI (SOUTH)
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging a tax show cause notice as premature, holding that statutory remedies must be exhausted before judicial intervention.
Sunita Devi v. Kapil Kumar Ahluwalia
The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit seeking injunctions and damages for breach of a franchise business arrangement as barred by a prior binding compromise decree requiring mutual consent for business decisions.
Indiraa Bhasin v. Ashwini Gupta
The Delhi High Court allowed the landlord’s eviction petition on bona fide necessity grounds, set aside the tenant’s leave to defend, and granted time to vacate with conditions and stay of execution.
Neeraj v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 376 IPC after the complainant admitted false allegations and the parties married, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process.
Sh. Sandeep Rawal v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR and proceedings based on an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's withdrawal of prosecution.
Union of India v. GL Litmus Events Private Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award granting interest on delayed payments, holding that contract clauses limiting liability did not bar interest and that judicial interference under Section 34 is limited.
Om Prakash v. Ramesh Chander Sharma & Ors
The High Court dismissed the tenant's revision petition as withdrawn after he voluntarily surrendered possession and the parties settled all claims in an eviction dispute under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
S. Mohinder Singh v. Inder Mohan Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit seeking cancellation of documents and possession of property, holding that prior admissions and limitation bar the suit under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.
Gurpreet Singh v. Amit Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a revision petition against eviction under the Delhi Rent Control Act, stayed the eviction order subject to the tenant's undertaking to vacate by a fixed date and pay use and occupation charges.
Chatar Bhuj v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354 and 354C IPC on the ground of amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's non-objection.
Manab Kumar Singh v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under the Arms Act for possession of cartridges found inadvertently without mens rea, emphasizing the importance of criminal intent and lawful possession.
Asha Karki v. Rajesh Karki
The Delhi High Court held that maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. must be awarded from the date of filing the petition unless valid reasons are recorded for a later date, and set aside the Family Court's order limiting maintenance to the date of the final order.
Rachna Malaviya v. State, NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The High Court set aside the Sessions Court's order allowing recall of prosecution witnesses under Section 311 Cr.P.C. due to abuse of process and upheld the trial court's dismissal of the application, emphasizing the need for speedy trial and caution in recalling witnesses.
Parvinderjit Kaur v. D.D.A. and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that cancellation of flat allotment without proper service of the demand-cum-allotment letter is unlawful and directed the authority to consider the petitioner for allotment under the 1979 scheme.
Meena v. Ishwarti
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's finding that respondent No.1 was the lawful wife of late Charan Singh entitled to terminal benefits, dismissing the appellant's claim based on a subsequent invalid marriage.
Zamrudpur Welfare Association v. South Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking reiteration of earlier directions on layout plan compliance and encroachment, directing authorities to comply or face contempt proceedings.
Sh. Kishor Jaiswal v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings based on an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainants' consent to discontinue prosecution.
Union of India v. Jagbiri Devi
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order granting family pension to the widow of a deceased employee deemed regularized after long quasi-permanent service despite lack of formal regularization.