Shashm Kant Sehagal v. The Registrar Cooperative Societies, Delhi & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 04 Feb 2020 · 2020:DHC:3847-DB
S. Muralidhar; Talwant Singh
W.P.(C)12698/2019 & CM APPL.51882/2019
2020:DHC:3847-DB
administrative petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court directed the Rule 90 Committee to decide on the petitioners' allotment within a stipulated time and disposed of the petitions, allowing legal remedies post-decision.

Full Text
Translation output
o HIGH COURT OF DELHI 30,31
W.P.(C)12698/2019& CM APPL.51882/2019(stay)
SHASm KANT SEHAGAL Petitioner
Through: Mr Abhi Gupta,Advocate.
VERSUS
THE REGISTRAR COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, DELHI& ANR. Respondents
Through: Mr Sandeep Kumar, Advocate for R- 2.
Mr Santosh Kumar Tripathi, ASC for GNCTD with Mr Arpit Bisht and Mr
Rajat Mangla,Advocates.
W.P.(C)13465/2019
VINOD KUMAR JAIN Petitioner
Through: Mr Abhi Gupta,Advocate.
VERSUS
REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES AND ANR. Respondents
Through: Mr Anupam Srivastava, ASC for GNCTD/R-1 with Mr Dhairya Gupta, Advocates.
Mr Sandeep Kumar, Advocate for R- 2.
CORAM:
JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH
04.02.2020
ORDER

1. The Court is informed by the counsel appearing for the RespondentNo.l 2020:DHC:3847-DB H that the Rule 90 Committee will be convened within three weeks and that the decision on forwarding the Petitioners' names for allotment, will be taken atthose meetings.

2. The decision of the Rule 90 Committee will be communicated to the Petitioners, not later than 15^'^ March,2020.Ifthe Petitioners are aggrieved by such orders, it will be open to them to seek appropriate remedies in accordance with law.

3. The petitions are disposed of in above terms. The pending is also application is also disposed of. No costs.

FEBRUARY 04,2020 rd S-MUMLIDHAR,j. TALWANT SINGH,J.