Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Super Cassettes Industries Pvt Ltd v. Prime Cable Network and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that a cable operator's unauthorized broadcast of copyrighted works constitutes infringement, granting permanent injunction and damages to the copyright owner under the Copyright Act, 1957.
Jaiveer Singh Virk v. Sir Sobha Singh & Sons Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit seeking allotment of flats in a family-owned company property, holding that such claims are barred by company law jurisdiction and the alleged family settlement was unenforceable against the company.
Canara Bank v. P. Selathal
Civil suits challenging Debt Recovery Tribunal decrees are barred under the RDDBFI Act and liable to be rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC when statutory remedies are available and fraud allegations are illusory.
87e454f77b5c4e454d7d1fa365adf4c141e221c8c5c5da78d975322c3a78d7dc
The court dismissed the petitioner's appeal in a property dispute, affirming the respondent's lawful possession and title and rejecting frivolous criminal complaints.
Canara Bank v. P. Selathal
Civil suits challenging a Debt Recovery Tribunal decree are barred under the RDDBFI Act and liable to be rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC if vexatious and without proper pleadings of fraud.
Kirti Vijayvargiya v. Rahul Vijayvargiya
The Supreme Court annulled the marriage of the parties and disposed of their matrimonial disputes upon their mutual settlement under Article 142 of the Constitution.
Kirti Vijayvargiya v. Rahul Vijayvargiya
The Supreme Court annulled the marriage of the parties under Article 142 following their amicable settlement and disposed of all related proceedings accordingly.
BANK OF INDIA v. M/S. BRINDAVAN AGRO INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.
The Supreme Court held that a bank's processing fees and TEV charges debited before loan sanction are valid if authorized and known to the customer, setting aside consumer fora orders directing full refund.
State of Odisha v. Sri Satya Narayan Behura
The Supreme Court remanded the matter for fresh consideration of the respondent's entitlement to financial upgradation under the RACP Scheme, emphasizing the need for thorough adjudication of all contentions and material.
State of Odisha & Ors. v. Sri Satya Narayan Behura
The Supreme Court remanded the dispute over financial upgradation under the RACP Scheme for fresh consideration by the High Court after allowing additional evidence and submissions.
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. v. Union of India
The Supreme Court held that electricity tariff circulars issued by the State Electricity Board before the Regulatory Commission's constitution are valid and cannot be retrospectively quashed, and refunds ordered without merit consideration may cause unjust enrichment.
SHRI PARESHBHAI AMRUTLAL PATEL v. THE STATE OF GUJARAT
The Supreme Court directed transfer and joint trial of two complaints involving the same cheque to avoid conflicting decisions, refusing to quash the later FIR but ensuring consolidated adjudication.
SHRI PARESHBHAI AMRUTLAL PATEL v. THE STATE OF GUJARAT
The Supreme Court directed transfer of FIR proceedings to the court where an earlier cheque bounce complaint is pending for joint hearing, refusing to quash the FIR.
District Bar Association, Dehradun v. Ishwar Shandilya & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that advocates have no right to strike or boycott courts as it obstructs justice, amounts to contempt, and violates fundamental rights, upholding the High Court’s directions restraining such strikes.
District Bar Association, Dehradun v. Ishwar Shandilya & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that advocates have no right to strike or boycott courts as it obstructs justice and upheld the High Court’s directions restraining such strikes, emphasizing the duty of Bar Councils to discipline errant advocates.
Commissioner, Directorate of Logistics v. M/s. Almighty Techserv
The Supreme Court granted interim relief allowing the government to proceed with the tender awarded to M/s. ASVA Power Systems India Pvt. Ltd. for urgent procurement, subject to withholding disputed amounts pending final hearing.
Vinod Kumar v. Sila Magistrate Mau
The Supreme Court held that disputes over division of compensation among co-owners under the National Highways Act, 1956 must be referred to the civil court having original jurisdiction, and set aside the Magistrate's order interfering with the acquisition officer's compensation determination.
Baldev Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners accused under Sections 420/34 IPC, subject to furnishing bonds and cooperating with the investigation.
Tej Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of a father for sexual assault on his daughter, relying on her credible sole testimony corroborated by DNA evidence, and rejected claims of defective investigation.
M/S G. S. BHAMRA AND SONS v. DELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition directing the respondent to hand over possession of the industrial plot to the partnership firm upon compliance with document requisitions, rejecting technical objections and improper charge demands.