Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal Bar Association Delhi v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to treat the writ petition as a representation and decide the petitioners' claim within 16 weeks, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.
State v. Nibul
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's acquittal under Section 307 IPC and conviction under Section 324 IPC, emphasizing that appellate interference with acquittal requires very substantial and compelling reasons.
M/S AVON HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED v. M/S TRADE INTERNATIONAL THROUGH P.K HANDA SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP
The Delhi High Court extended the time for passing the arbitral award under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, regularizing the delay with parties' consent.
Utility Engineers (I) Ltd. v. Official Liquidator
The Delhi High Court ordered the final dissolution of M/s Utility Engineers (I) Ltd. under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956, discharging the Official Liquidator and permitting transfer of unclaimed dividends to the Reserve Bank of India.
State (NCT of Delhi) v. Saan Mohd. @ Sonu & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of accused in a POCSO sexual assault case due to inconsistencies in the victim's testimony and lack of forensic evidence linking the accused to the crime.
Madan Lal Chawla & Anr v. Allahabad Bank & Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld the DRT and CMM orders permitting Allahabad Bank to take possession and auction a mortgaged property, holding that challenges must be made before the DRT and the CMM acted within jurisdiction under the SARFAESI Act.
State v. Shamsher Singh
The High Court set aside the acquittal of a police constable charged under Section 409 IPC for misappropriation of an official pistol, holding that inconsistent defense failed to raise reasonable doubt, but reduced the sentence to six months imprisonment.
Rajan Bansal v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings arising therefrom on the ground of amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's consent.
Rajender Singh @ Rajender Sandhu v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and criminal proceedings arising from a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and the complainant's withdrawal of prosecution.
Lalit v. The State
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings arising therefrom on the ground of amicable settlement between the parties and the complainants' unwillingness to prosecute further.
DHARAMPAL GIRI v. STATE & ANR.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Charu Modi v. Lalit Modi
Delhi High Court granted interim injunctions in a family dispute, emphasizing the need for prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable harm under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC.
Bina Modi v. Lalit Modi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that suits seeking injunctions against arbitration proceedings are not maintainable, affirming that the arbitral tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction to decide arbitrability, and dismissed the petitions challenging ICC arbitration under the Trust Deed.
Mangayakarasi v. M. Yuvaraj
The Supreme Court restored the Trial Court's dismissal of divorce petition, holding that the High Court erred in reappreciating evidence and relying on acquittal in a criminal case as mental cruelty under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act.
Deepak Chandrakant Jhaveri & Ors. v. Johnson Dye Works Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that an inadvertent factual error with an unconditional apology does not constitute false evidence warranting criminal proceedings under Section 340 CrPC.
Deepak Chandrakant Jhaveri & Ors. v. Johnson Dye Works Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that an inadvertent factual error with an unconditional apology does not warrant criminal proceedings for giving false evidence under Section 340 CrPC and dismissed the application seeking such proceedings.
Ashok Kumar Gupta & Anr. v. M/s Sitalaxmi Sahuwala Medical Trust and others
The Supreme Court held that leave under Section 92 CPC was rightly granted to trustees seeking proper administration of a public charitable trust, restoring the Trial Court's decision and setting aside the High Court's order.
6c2610a6b766da25ee6ba79d735f88928f2eccaeacb008708ed51a46c29615fc
The court upheld the conviction under Section 92 IPC, ruling that the accused failed to prove their acts were done in good faith for public benefit, thus denying them protection under the section.
Ashok Kumar Gupta & Anr. v. M/s Sitalaxmi Sahuwala Medical Trust
The Supreme Court restored the District Court's grant of leave under Section 92 CPC to institute a suit for proper administration of a public charitable medical trust, holding the suit vindicated public rights and fell within the scope of Section 92.
Ramesh Singh v. Uttar Pradesh State & Ors.
The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's order setting aside the dismissal of a Basic Education Officer for irregular appointments and directed a fresh disciplinary inquiry conducted in accordance with natural justice.